REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Saturday, December 16, 2017

It's Time to Retire Fluoridation

Adding fluoride chemicals into public water supplies has no benefit but does have definite risks.

Sixty-five years ago this month, sodium fluoride powder was slowly poured into Grand Rapids, Michigan's public water supply to see if drinking fluoridated water (fluoridation) really safely reduced children's tooth decay. Nearby Muskegon was left fluoridation-free, for only 5 years, as the experiment's control city for comparison purposes even though evaluations were made after 15 years. (1)

Before then, sodium fluoride was mainly used as a rat poison.

The study failed and was seriously flawed; but early over-zealous fluoridationists ignored this inconvenient truth. Fluoridation was declared a success, anyway (2) and spread across the country and the world based on positive-spun PR but invalid science.

So what's happening today?

Grand Rapids children have high rates of tooth decay and fluoride overdose - dental fluorosis, white spotted, yellow, brown and/or pitted enamel.(3)

According to the Grand Rapids Press, one pediatric dentist said in 2007 "...we see children under the age of 2 with active decay...Rather than just a few cavities, we're seeing a lot of cavities. It's not unusual to see a child with 8 to 10 cavities." (4)

Despite 65 years of water fluoridation reaching 70% of Americans on public water supplies and virtually 100% via the food supply and despite 55 years of fluoridated toothpaste, tooth decay has increased in our most fluoridated population - toddlers - and untreated tooth decay has risen, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (5) Incredibly, American children have died from the consequences of untreated tooth decay. (5a) with up to 48% of US school children now sporting dental fluorosis, according to the CDC.

Today sodium fluoride is purchased from China and something's wrong with it. Water engineers complain it's clogging up their systems (6)

Fluoridation opposition is scientific, respectable and growing.

Over 2,700 professionals urge the US Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted, citing scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. See statement http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html

Also, eleven Environmental Protection Agency employee unions representing over 7000 environmental and public health professionals called for a moratorium on drinking water fluoridation programs across the country, and have asked EPA management to recognize fluoride as posing a serious risk of causing cancer in people.
Join them by writing to Congress here: http://congress.FluorideAction.Net

Approximately, 80 US communities rejected fluoridation in 2008 & 2009 (7).
National statistics show that fluoridation has not reduced tooth decay but has increased dental fluorosis 8

References:

1) Grand Rapids fluoridation Study - Results Pertaining to the

Eleventh Year of Fluoridation, by Francis A Arnold ,American Journal of Public Health, May 1957 "In making comparisons on these data it should be remembered that Muskegon started fluoridation in July 1951" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1551218/pdf/amjphnation01088-0018.pdf

2) Fluoridation: Errors and Omissions in Experimental Trials [Chapters
19, 20 and 21. Philip Sutton. Originally published in 1960]

3) "Some babies get too much fluoride," The Grand Rapids Press, by Morgan Jarema October 09, 2007 http://www.fluoridealert.org/news/3091.html

4) "Protecting kids' teeth includes trips to the dentist," The Grand Rapids Press, by Jennifer Ackerman-Haywood, June 19, 2007

5) "Tooth Decay In American Preschool Kids On The Rise"
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/07newsreleases/oralhealth.htm

5a) "For Want of a Dentist Pr. George's Boy Dies After Bacteria From Tooth Spread to Brain," Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/27/AR2007022702116.html
and
http://www.pedidental.org/pdfs/PDI%20Holiday%20Newsletter.pdf

6) "Feds Note Fluoride Problem," January 25, 2010
http://www.newburyportnews.com/punews/local_story_024222057.html

7) http://www.FluorideAction.Net/communities.htm
8) "Artificial Fluoridation No Benefit - Definite Harm," by Kathy Thiessen, PhD


About the Writer

Sally Stride is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

3 comments on It's Time to Retire Fluoridation

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Jack Bates on January 28, 2010 at 10:52 am

Fantastic journalism. So many people don't know about this. I knew the history and still learned from the citations you provided. Great work! I've linked this on all my social sites as a great ramp up on the subject of Fluoridatin.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By JJFCPA on January 28, 2010 at 03:13 pm

Interesting information and a researcher;s treasure trove on the subject. What other subjects do you have such knowledge of?

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Alethea on February 05, 2010 at 04:11 am

Yes! I agree! I wrote about this too!

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us



x


x