Saturday, July 21, 2018

Star Trek

by DLFerguson (writer), Brooklyn, New York, May 11, 2009


Movie Review


Paramount Pictures

Directed by J.J. Abrams

Produced by J.J. Abrams and Damon Lindelof

Written Robert Orci and Alex Kurtzman

Based on “Star Trek” created by Gene Roddenberry


For those of you who don’t know, I’ve been a fan of Star Trek ever since I can remember.  It was a nightly ritual for me that I couldn’t go to bed until I had watched Star Trek on WPIX here in New York where they reran it for years at 11:00PM.  And I’ve seen all the movies in the theaters the day they opened.  I’ve watched every episode of every Star Trek TV series.  Even “Voyager” and “Enterprise” I estimate I’ve read somewhere between fifty and seventy Star Trek books.

 I relate all this not to impress upon you how much of a Star Trek geek I am but to let you know that I consider myself pretty well versed in things Trek.  So when I tell you that the new STAR TREK movie is 80% on point you’ll have some faith that I know what I’m talking about.

 The selling points of the movie are twofold: One: it’s directed by J.J. Abrams who has mostly had success in TV with shows such as “Felicity””Alias””Lost” and “Fringe”.  But his motion picture track record hasn’t been too bad either what with his work on “Mission Impossible III” and “Cloverfield” Two: STAR TREK is Paramount’s attempt to reboot/relaunch its primary moneymaking franchise with an all new, younger cast playing the beloved characters of Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Scotty, Uhura, Sulu and Chekov as well as giving the Star Trek universe an updated look and feel.

For a long time I’ve felt that Star Trek needed new blood.  “Voyager” and “Enterprise” suffered from creative burnout as the producers of those shows had been with the franchise since “The Next Generation” and it showed.  Star Trek badly needed someone new to come aboard and bring freshness to the material.

Thankfully, J.J. Abrams and company have done exactly that.  STAR TREK isn’t a perfect movie and there are a couple of things that made me groan but there were also plenty of things that made me grin as well.

The movie tells us the story that The Original Series never did: how did the crew of the starship USS Enterprise first meet?  Well, first of all, through some imaginative time travel futzing involving Ambassador Spock (Leonard Nimoy) and his pursuit/being pursued by a Romulan named Nero (Eric Bana) we’re informed fairly early on that this is an alternate reality/timeline where things aren’t exactly the same as us old heads remember.  Most notable is that without the guiding influence of his father, James Tiberius Kirk (Chris Pine) is a rebellious, risk-taking malcontent.  But Captain Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood) the current captain of the Enterprise sees something in the young man and challenges him to join Starfleet.  Kirk accepts the challenge and signs up, meeting Nyota Uhura (Zoë Saldana) and Leonard “Bones” McCoy (Karl Urban)

Three years later, the planet Vulcan is attacked by Nero and his ginormous mining ship.  Starfleet heads out to stop him but the ships they send are all destroyed.  Except the Enterprise, of course, which is left in the command of Commander Spock (Zachary Quinto) a Human/Vulcan hybrid of frightening brilliance and severely disciplined logic who immediately clashes with the hot-headed Cadet Kirk as to the best way to deal with Nero.  It soon becomes apparent that the two men have to learn to put aside their differences and work together because Nero also has plans to destroy Earth.  All while meeting Hikaru Sulu (John Cho) Pavel Chekov (Anton Yelchin) and Montgomery Scott (Simon Pegg) who along with Uhura and McCoy will become their lifelong companions in adventure and exploration.

 The plot in STAR TREK really isn’t all that important or even interesting, to be honest.  This is either the third or fourth STAR TREK movie that has had some huge cosmic whatchamacallit heading toward Earth to destroy it and the Enterprise is the only ship able to stop it.  Makes you wonder why The Federation even bothers maintaining a Starfleet when it’s the Enterprise that’s always the only ship available all the time.

No, the real reason this STAR TREK exists is to introduce us to the new cast, the new Enterprise and set up this alternate universe/timeline so that we can go on to other movies that will hopefully have more engaging stories.  The special effects are appropriately dazzling and at times even inspired.  I’d have liked to have seen more of the interior of the new Enterprise but what we do see is glitzy to the max.

The acting is better than I thought it would be.  The new cast wisely doesn’t try to imitate the mannerisms or speech patterns of the original cast.  With the exception of Anton Yelchin who deliberately does the Classic Chekov accent.  Instead, they channel the essence of what makes those characters work and they pull it off quite well.  Especially Karl Urban as Bones McCoy and Zachary Quinto as Spock.  Karl Urban has the added fun of throwing off a few of McCoy’s famous lines and he does them excellently.  Zoë Saldana doesn’t have as much to do as her co-stars (and dammit, would it have killed them to have her say “hailing frequencies open, Captain” at least once?) but the relationship between her and one of her crew mates opens up a lot of new possibilities I’d like to see explored in the next film.  Eric Bana is a disappointment as Nero and in fact, Nero’s a pretty poor villain.  There’s a reason we remember Ricardo Montalban as Khan and Christopher Plummer as Chang: they were magnificently realized villains of Shakespearian stature.  Nobody’s going to remember Nero.  Neither are they going to remember Ben Cross as Sarek, Spock’s father.  Cross is so bland and dull it’s downright sad.

The movie is chock full of Easter eggs and winks to the original series and films.  I got a big chuckle out of the nod to “The Wrath of Khan” during the scene where Kirk is taking the Kobayashi Maru test.  And there’s even a tribble thrown in during a crucial scene and no, I’m not going to tell you where it is. 

That’s not to say I loved everything about the movie.  There are way too many scenes where Kirk is hanging off a cliff or on a ledge and if you took coincidence out of this movie then you just wouldn’t have a movie.  Too many characters just happen to be in the right place at the right time and there’s a coincidence involving Kirk and Spock Prime (as Leonard Nimoy is billed) that made me want to throw something at the screen.  And I never got the sense that anybody was in any real danger.  Even though a major character gets killed off I really didn’t feel any sense of loss since I never got to know this version of the character at all.

And speaking of Nimoy, he meshes so well with Pine, Quinto and Pegg in the scenes he has with them I wished he had had scenes with the other members of the cast.  It’s a nice, lump in the throat moment when young Kirk and the aged Spock meet and there’s a wonderful nod to The Voyage Home involving Spock and Scotty.

So should you see STAR TREK?  If you’re a fan then you’ve no doubt seen it already and have probably seen it a second or even a third time.  But this is a movie that’s accessible to non-fans who just may want to check it out to see what all the fuss is about or who just want a slam-bang space opera.  Hopefully with the next movie we’ll get more into the exploring strange new worlds, seeking out new life and new civilizations that is really the meat of what STAR TREK is about.  But as a launching point for a new series of STAR TREK movies, this is terrific stuff.

127 minutes

Rated PG-13

About the Writer

DLFerguson is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

0 comments on Star Trek

Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.

Rate This Article

Your vote matters to us