REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Last Update: 7:10pm

Black Friday Stomp

Long Island Wal-Mart worker didn't deserve to die.

On Black Friday, 34-year-old Jdimytai Damour never knew what hit him. Frankly, that’s not even Wal-Mart’s fault. Damour was working at a Long Island, NY Wal-Mart when the doors opened at 5:00 to allow shoppers into the store to begin the Christmas Shopping Season. Throngs of bargain-seekers clamored through the doors when they opened and Mr. Damour’s life came to a very abrupt and tragic end.

There is only one word in the English language that even comes close to describing this incident: stupid.

It isn’t Damour’s fault, he was doing the job he was told to do. It isn’t Wal-Mart’s fault, they were just trying to make their money, like every other store that opens at the God-awful hours of 4 and 5 in the morning. No, the fault of Damour’s death lies squarely on the shoulders of the idiotic morons who stampeded through the doors of the store in order to by a 50” flat screen television so they could impress their friends at next year’s Super Bowl party.

The Friday after Thanksgiving is called Black Friday because that is the day most retailers finally make enough profit to cover all their losses throughout the year and they can begin operating in the black. Steep discounts for merchandise are what draw people to participate in this American “running of the bulls.” Saving money is what it is all about. Get to the store early so you can get that big TV or that hot new video game system or whatever else it is you want before someone else gets it. What a way to live.

Personally, I hate commercial Christmas. Don’t confuse that with Christmas. I love Christmas. I grew up where there is supposed to be snow on the ground, the temperature reaches a high of 20 degrees Fahrenheit and there’s a big fire in the fireplace. Sure there’s presents under a tree, the house has more lights on it than the runways at Dallas/Ft. Worth International Airport and Christmas music all around. But that’s Christmas. I’m talking about Commercial Christmas where every store in town has Christmas decorations up the day after the Fourth of July and keeps them up until the day before Valentine’s Day. Commercial Christmas has people clamoring through stores and malls looking for that “just right” gift to give to that persnickety mother-in-law who couldn’t utter a kind word about her not-good-enough-for-my-son, daughter-in-law. Commercial Christmas turns otherwise mild-mannered citizens into raging animals capable of committing random acts of brutal violence in an attempt to secure some worthless piece of electronic equipment made in a country that doesn’t even celebrate Christmas.

Beginning the day after Thanksgiving, I hole up in my house and venture out only when required to sojourn to my place of employment and to return to my domicile when I have fulfilled my commitment to providing eight hours of unappreciated labor for an amount of money equivalent to a proverbial kick in the crotch.

I avoid stores that do not exclusively sell foodstuffs. As much as I like Wal-Mart, I avoid Super Wal-Marts during Christmas as if these places were leper colonies. I just go in to get what I need to survive that week. I’m not there to buy a big screen TV; I don’t care if you arrived first, just shut the hell up and leave me alone and let me buy my bread, peanut butter, toilet paper and orange juice. And quit coughing on me you inconsiderate imbecile – I don’t want or need your sinus infection. Tell your bratty little mini-me’s to quit kicking my shopping cart because if you don’t, I’m going to pick them up and toss them head first into the two-for-five-dollar DVD bins and then probably launch you into the hanging bicycle rack. I have no patience for Christmas shoppers. They are most often rude. Their eyes are open wide like they are some crazed zombie searching for human flesh. They drool at the “45% Off” sale racks and they howl like hyenas at anyone who comes within 250 yards of “their” parking spot.

These are the kinds of people who stepped on Jdimytai Damour in Long Island. Correction, these are the animals who trampled Jdimytai Damour to death because they were only thinking of themselves. No one even stopped to help Damour. They went on their way looking for their bargains. Even reports coming out of Long Island, NY say that the store was closed due to the incident and that people who were waiting outside for paramedics to bring out Damour’s body were upset that they weren’t being allowed to go in and shop. Talk about cold, cruel and heartless. They’re more worried about not being able to buy an X-Box than they are the fact that their selfishness brought a tragic end to an innocent man’s life.

I’m more than justified in hating Commercial Christmas. The violent death of Jdimytai Damour is just another reason. Why would any sane human being want to be involved in that kind of crap? If I can’t buy it when it’s convenient for me, it isn’t worth having.



About the Writer

D. E. Carson is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

21 comments on Black Friday Stomp

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By Julian Gallo on December 02, 2008 at 05:09 am

D.E.,

I am totally with you on this.  I find the whole idea behind "Black Friday" disgusting---meaning not the stores and their huge sales and bargains, but the throngs of drooling, idiotic consumers who just can't wait to get their hands on discounted consumer goods.  To me, "Black Friday" has always revealed the worst side of consumerist culture.  It has nothing to do with Christmas but everything to do with, like you said, for some to feel somewhat "special" by being the "first" to get their paws on the latest gadget for a very low price. 

Your comparison to the "running of the bulls" is apt.  Every year this happens somewhere in this country and it's disgusting.  In this particular incident I heard that people were actually angry that Walmart closed the store down after the employee was killed.  One of them was overheard saying "I've been waiting on line for hours!  How dare they close the store down!" (A comment I heard on the news when reporters were interviewing people afterwards).  You can't get anymore callous than this. 

I do have one minor disagreement with you, though.  Walmart is partially to blame as well in the sense that they should have some sort of system in place to prevent this stampede from occurring in the first place---like having a more organized opening instead of just opening the doors and allowing the maniacs to barge in like that.  They know people are crazy and should have expected this sort of carnage.  It happens every year.  Other than that, you're right as far as them having the right to open early and having such a huge sale.  After all, their goal is to try to make money by having customers in the store to shop there. 

What's really tragic to me is that this man had to lose his life because of the rabid greed of consumers who's only concern is to be the "first" to get their hands on the hottest item for a very low price--and the fact that some just didn't seem to care at all; that is was more important to them to be the first on the block for that flat screen TV than it was the well being of another human being.  (I hear a pregnant woman was also trampled in the mele as well). 

You are right:  This has absolutely nothing to do with the meaning of Christmas and everything to do with unbridled consumerism.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 7
By HurricaneDean on December 02, 2008 at 05:26 pm

D.E., I love the "running of the bulls" analogy. Spot on!

My hippie girlfriend and I only buy from small local stores and hand made crafts. We even make our own holiday cards. We think it is a good antidote to the whole commercialism of the holidays.

Good article.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By D. E. Carson on December 02, 2008 at 09:18 pm

Thank you Dean.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 3
By Craig B on December 02, 2008 at 09:41 pm

Well done buddy, Wal-Mart Watch says the trampled employee was not properly trained so he did not know the extreme danger he faced at that moment: "While Mr. Damour's death was an accident, Wal-Mart Watch believes it can be attributed to Wal-Mart's blatant disregard for the concern and safety of its workers and customers.”

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By D. E. Carson on December 03, 2008 at 02:59 am

"Wal-Mart's blatant disregard for the concern and safety of its workers and customers.”

Uh, right.  Big talk from a website whose sole purpose is to take pot shots at the world's largest retailer.  WMW has nothing better to do than sit around and just wait for another reason to bash Wal-Mart -- a company that has done far more things right than wrong.  But you'd never know that by reading WMW's comments.  BTW: that isn't directed at you specifically Craig -- I give you credit for being much more intelligent than the bozos at WMW.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 3
By HurricaneDean on December 03, 2008 at 08:47 am

The main criticism of Wal Mart I read in the papers was that the store had all their security guards inside the store at the time of the opening. Apperantely, they were more concerned to shoplifters once they were open then themob forming outside their doors, but on their lot nonetheless. Some have suggested, that his could have been avoided with a little crowd control from the security guards. So, that is where the potential fault might lie with Wal Mart. However, those that trampled over the poor kid, and did not go back to help him, are far more at fault, as far as I'm concerned.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Joseph M on December 03, 2008 at 01:34 pm

Why would anyone who invests in those mongrels believe they are responsible for anything? That is a no-brainer.

The song remains the same - if you shop at Walmart, and if you believe in Walmart, you don't believe in your community.  I don't want one in the city where I live, and amazingly, there is not one in the city where I live because we won't let them build one in the city where I live.  The closest one is 15 miles away in lovely Van Nuys.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 3
By AmyO on December 03, 2008 at 03:45 pm

I actually saw an article that blamed the media for the madness of Black Friday. Apparently the media has perpetuated this problem by advertising sales and encouraging people to go out and get them before they are gone. Of course, it is always the fault of the media - everything is - and not the fault of greedy people who get up at absurd hours to buy STUFF that they cherish more than human life. I personally would rather spend an extra $10 or $20 on my Christmas presents a week later than get up at dawn and wait in line and then watch the madness that unfolds. It really is a sorry sight to see. There were actually 3 people that died nationwide on "Black Friday". As Jon Stewart said, "3 PEOPLE?!" This is just crazy.  I suppose the media doesn't help the situation but people need to take responsibility for their own behavior.  Until our society realizes that material goods are not a measure of someone's worth, this will not get any better.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By D. E. Carson on December 03, 2008 at 11:05 pm

"Why would anyone who invests in those mongrels believe they are responsible for anything? That is a no-brainer."

But on the other hand, why would anyone want ALL of the blame to go onto Wal-Mart unless they happen to seethe with the same hatred for Wal-Mart as liberals have for George W. Bush.

I think it's sad that a city would actually ban Wal-Mart but have no qualms about allowing in a Sears, K-Mart, JCPenney, Target, Home Depot or Lowe's.  All of those retailers operate on the same model as Wal-Mart but no one excoriates them for their practices.  They all work their employees to death for minimum wage and spends almost nothing on benefits and no one complains about them, but those stores are all over your precious Los Angeles.

Little hypocrisy there dontcha think?

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: -1
By Joseph M on December 04, 2008 at 01:58 am

"All of those retailers operate on the same model as Wal-Mart..."

That is one terribly blanketed (and false) statement to make to defend Wal-Mart.

I'll stick with the case of business models Wal-Mart vs Sears - mainly bc Target & JC Penny's models are far more similar to that of Wal-Mart (but not the same) and KMart is a piece of crap not worthy of mention ( they went bankrupt a few years ago).   While the profit margins are pretty similar between the two wooley mammoths, around 20 or 25 percent  - it is the Source of the profit margins that varies drastically.  Sears profits off a rotation of "assets" primarily (over 60% of their sales) in form of credit card sales.

Wal-Mart's profits are based on high-volume, high margin goods - which creates those dizzying rushes at the holidays by assloads of credit-less stampeders because they dump "amazing" deals on customers.

While Target touts itself the Anti-Walmart in the sense they claim to be cleaner (hardly objective),  they do have better and happier employees in leu of claiming to have the highest profit margin.  That's why some of the higher end items are a few bucks cheaper at Wal-Mart. In the end, they don't have the cash flow of Wal-Mart and don't pay the dividends Wal-Mart pays its shareholders.  Yay.

By the way - Amy O, I'm hoping you realize that when you say "media has perpetuated this problem by advertising sales" that nobody should actually say something like that unless by media, you mean the company "Blasting Prices Today Only!"'s PR department that creates such sales to begin with.  The media at-large isn't responsible for this one in the least because the media doesn't know anything unless a COMPANY advertises or leaks a massive sale.

275 lbs of security guard got trampled to death because there was no que, no system or methodology on artificially scarce goods (crap) to serve these animals that will ultimately lead to equal culpability by the Wal.  Mark that -$15 mill on the 2008 P&L after legal fees.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: -2
By Joseph M on December 04, 2008 at 03:30 am

I know nothing about Low's as I've never been to one.  I'm told it is "alright".

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Seema Upadhyay on December 04, 2008 at 01:35 pm

Well written article D.E. The retail boom is a global thing and it's the company that plans their advertising and PR strategy and not just the PR agency. Every company wants to increase their bottomline and therefore one sees commercialization of Christmas, Diwali, Valentine's day, Friendship day n lot more days invented by the retailers to make some quick cash.

Its a vicious cycle of demand and supply, if there are no consumers then obviously the retailers will stop the commercialisation as they spend lot of money in advertising and PR.

What lesson one need to learn from the above story is to shop smart and not be taken for a ride by the heavy discounts by the retailers, infact some or most of the products sold at heavy discounts are of either mediocre quality or are older versions or models.

Having said that, its really sad that we see a stampede everytime a big retailer offers discounts, Yes it happens in India, though we still don't have a Walmart here but we have similar format stores. I still love those pop n mom stores; as there is a connectivity and personal touch with them, alas not many exist now thanks to the boom in retail sector which is one of the sunrise industries.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 3
By AmyO on December 04, 2008 at 03:08 pm

Actually Joseph, I was being sarcastic in my statement that it is the media's fault, which I guess wasn't clear. Of course it is not the fault of the media, it is the fault of those who care more about things than people, which I thought I had expressed in the rest of my comment. I thought it was stupid that someone actually wrote an article saying that what happened is the media's fault.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: -1
By Joseph M on December 04, 2008 at 03:52 pm

Ok - you say it's not media.  It's people.  And you say it's people's love for "things".  You did explain that, twice.   

But you won't go as far as to disagree with the author's point which tells me you are a Walmart shopper. That, or I just don't get the sarcasm.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By AmyO on December 04, 2008 at 04:26 pm

Um, ok? I don't know how you got me being a Wal-Mart shopper out of that... but for the record, I don't actually have a Wal-Mart close enough to me to shop at. Sorry to disappoint you.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By D. E. Carson on December 06, 2008 at 12:40 am

Amy: Don't worry about Joseph calling you a "Wal-Mart Shopper".  He's just jealous that he can't darken the door of one himself.

Hell I figure if Joseph is going to call me a liar, I might as well actually put a lie out here so he can feel justified -- oh, wait, Joseph just hates Wal-Mart out of spite and for no actual reason and doesn't care if what he says has any fact to back it up.  Nevermind that business schools actually use Wal-Mart's model as a case study in economics.  But again, people who bash Wal-Mart are the same people who know absolutely nothing about economics and try to tell you that the best way for the government to raise revenue in a recession is to raise taxes on the rich and cut taxes for the middle class and the poor.  Yeah, that'll really work well, won't it President Kennedy???

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: -1
By Joseph M on December 06, 2008 at 11:02 pm

DE - you are being absurd.  I said your generic statement was FALSE which is a hell of a lot different from calling you a liar.  Get a grip, man.  You said ALL those companies operate using the same business formula of Wal-Mart, and that is completely false, not because you are a liar, but because you are generalizing.  Business schools use Wal-Mart's business format because it makes money, and what is a business school to teach if not bottom-line dollars?  The Wal is a leader in what they do, and a lot of people - not just me - are now down with what they have done to achieve such a power-strangle on competition.  You just can't argue with bottom-line profits, but you can have a word when it comes to where you spend you money if you don't like something.  I don't like Wal and that doesn't make you a liar, it was just incorrect (false, not suiting... however you wanna say it) - their plan isn't the way every company should operate or there really would be fewer options for consumers.  Plus, I have never met a Wal-Mart employee with good things to say about their employers, but again, that is just MY experience, and I have met a few...

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: -1
By D. E. Carson on December 08, 2008 at 03:04 am

If these people who work for Wal-Mart can't say anything good about Wal-Mart, then why the hell are they working for Wal-Mart?  If the working environment at Wal-Mart is so bad, then stop working there!  If you're so desperate for money (and I'm not saying you work there Joseph, this is what a generalization looks like) that you'll work somewhere that treats you as bad as you say then you must either be really, really stupid or the working environment at Wal~Mart isn't as bad as you would have us believe.

I have a real problem with people bemoaning how horribly they're supposedly treated at Wal-Mart yet they don't have the guts to walk out the door and not come back.  If it's so damn bad there, get the hell out!  Thing is, I'll bet that every single one of those people who bad-mouth Wal-Mart walk out the front door and straight to the bank with their checks on payday.  They're cashing the check so it must not be as bad as they'd have the rest of us believe.

I count my two years working for Wal-Mart the greatest experience in my life.  They were more than fair to me.  They gave me every opportunity to move up in the company and I did.  I started out working in the stock room, moved up to front-end cashier and then became the closing electronics department associate and I did it in less than 24 months.  I was well taken care of by my managers and assistant managers -- if I had a problem no one ever showed me the door.  The assistants would listen to me if I had an issue and they would help me get that issue resolved in a way that was acceptable to all.  I never felt threatened to work overtime off the clock.  I was always paid for every minute I was in the building as an employee (sorry, associate) and I learned some valuable customer service skills that I still use to this day even though I haven't punched a Wal-Mart time clock in almost 20 years.

The only reason I don't still work for Wal-Mart is that I can't live on what they're paying.  I could if I were to move under a bridge and divorce my wife and daughter, but I will always count myself fortunate to have been a Wal-Mart Alum.

Sounds a whole lot different than the crap you're being fed now a days, doesn't it Joseph?

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Julian Gallo on December 08, 2008 at 08:37 am

You know what I find funny about all this is that there was a similar situation here in New York City quite a few years ago when they decided to open a K-Mart right in the heart of Greenwich Village and the whole community went ballistic about it.  There were protests outside the site, people were screaming and yelling about how it was going to ruin it for the Mom and Pops etc.  I used to walk by laughing because I knew each and every one of them would eventually wind up shopping there.  So here we are over a decade later and sure enough the place is always packed to the gills, including punk rockers, anarchists and community activists.  They were trying to build one in my neighborhood, but the community board fought it and they decided not to build it.  But I promise you if it wound up going up, it would have been teeming with customers.

I don't think we have a Walmart in NYC as far as I know.  Most of them are out on Long Island, I think.  But I guarantee you that if there was one, people would shop there. 

I don't really have any gripe since if there ever was one in NYC there are thousands of alternatives if you don't like it there.  Really, K-Mart, Target, Walmart...all those kinds of stores aren't the main reason why Mom & Pop stores are disappearing in New York.  It's the astronomican rents these stores have to pay for the space that's doing it.  I don't know how having a Walmart effects other communities but I always say that if there is one that threatens the existence of Mom & Pop stores, then don't shop there.  But people do anyway.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Joseph M on December 09, 2008 at 01:02 am

Julian, it is a funny issue - and I have spoken with my shopping choices.  And because I have to save money like most of the rest of society, it becomes a tortuous choice even to spend an extra dollar for cough medicine because I won't go to the Wal not even for a cheap candy bar.  BUT - I will occassionally go to Target - and there really isn't anything personal to it except for 5 people who were associates at 1 point or another.  Sure, their experiences vary - 3 of these folks were whiners, and had nothing + to say and yadda yadda.  I'm with D.E. on that point - if you don't like it - get on with it, see ya.  1 co-worker of mine supplements his income by taking on shifts at a Wal and is aggressive in his defense of the Wal.  Nobody likes being told he/she work(ed) for a crappy company & it's it is never a fun thing to do - and yet, he and I have reasonable conversations abt his experiences and what the company provides for the community.  Cheap product and low paying jobs.  To me, it is the same argument many have abt cutting the budget for  space exploration... Why do it when there are problems right here at Home?  In Walmart's case, as the many documented lawsuits & movies (to soon be described as "conspiratorial propaganda" by Carson's Corner) have exposed, there is a heavy cost.  Right now I'm in Southern Utah on a 3,200 mile trek across 100's of beautiful small cities all supported on local shops.  I'll let you know when I find my first Walmart - But the people in the cities I've been to so far buy what they need and support their community with every penny.  Those days are gone in places like NYC and LA -  My #1 point was Wal's culpability and that D.E. has a vested interest in his former-employer NOT getting trashed - OK, and it's revealed here again, OK?    Back to the article - they will be found 1/2 liable for the case of the fat guy getting trampled to death. They are, at some disgusting level, culpible.  If you want to argue this point further to gain mass hits on a pro-Wal article, I'd consider that to be logical, but it won't help.  And D.E., hopefully we all learned from our early work experiences in ways we can use til the day we retire - that is the point, and some people understand this concept and adopt it - while others do not.  (It still had nothing to do with my real #2 point - Walmart's business model being used by all those companies YOU incorrectly list. Still no addressing this issue - Well played, sir.  Well played.)   Nothing you have said is any different from the "crap" I've been fed  You're experience and your position in defense of Wal is NOT as unique as you'd like to think.  Still won't change my mind as a shopper.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Joseph M on December 09, 2008 at 01:06 am

Amy:  "Um, ok? I don't know how you got me being a Wal-Mart shopper out of that... but for the record, I don't actually have a Wal-Mart close enough to me to shop at. Sorry to disappoint you."   Certainly NOT disappointed, and is why I added the part where I "just didn't get your sarcasm" because as we all know, sarcasm just doesn't translate here at the Broooooooooooo....  Are you really marking negatives?  HA! Now THAT is awesome.

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us






x


x