REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Last Update: 7:20am

The Banking Crisis CEO's & Salaries

by Lila M. (writer), September 19, 2008

Getting to know some of the CEO’s behind the banking crisis.

While many struggle to save their retirement funds, homes and jobs, there are a few individuals who will still take home their annual eight digit salaries.  In lieu of the banking crisis, which I have also have been financially affected by, I’ve read articles and stories and checked facts on who exactly the CEO’s of these big financial corporations in distress are.  I’ve put together a list of the salaries some of the ‘geniuses’ behind these falling companies will profit despite the bailout on Wall Street.   Not only are these salaries unbelievable, but some of these individuals could potentially stand to gain a few more dollars when they’re companies get sold/bought/bailed out, etc.

Morgan Stanley

John Mack, CEO of Morgan Stanley, $17 million
Interesting Funfact:

Was accused in 2006 of insider trading tactics, alleging he tipped off a friend to a merger in 2001, but was cleared later of charges.

JP Morgan Chase

James Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, $20 million
Interesting Funfact:

He was forced to resign (technically fired) in 1998 from Citigroup for a huge plunge in profits which rocked the company.

Bear Stearns
James Cayne, CEO of Bear Stearns, $28 million
Interesting Funfact:

Nothing, and I mean nothing, can stop this man from a sunny day on the golf course…

"On June 14, the day when Bear Stearns reported a 10 percent drop in its operating earnings for the second quarter, Mr. Cayne was reported to be out of the office playing golf.  On Thursday, June 21, as several big banks pressured Bear Stearns to increase the collateral on loans they had made to its sinking fund, Mr. Cayne was again…out of the office playing golf.  The next day, in the biggest rescue of a hedge fund in almost a decade, Bear Stearns pledged to put up $3.2 billion to bail out its fund (actually $1.6).”

Lehman Brothers

Richard Fuld Jr., CEO of Lehman Bros Holdings, $71 million

Interesting Funfact:

Had multiple opportunities to sell a portion of LB even with offers as late as August of this year, which would have helped to avoid the fallout, but stubbornly refused, tuning out advice and warning signals.

Goldman Sachs

Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs Group, $73 million

Interesting Funfact:

A staunch Democrat who robustly endorsed Hillary Clinton and also contributed significantly to John Kerry's failed 2004 Presidential campaign.

Merrill Lynch

John Thain – Ceo of Merrill Lynch, $81 million

Interesting Funfact:

He is John McCain’s top economic advisor.  He stands to make an extra $11m off the sale of Merrill Lynch to BofA.

All men are highly respected with Ivy-League or upscale accolades and accomplishments.  Some have even agreed to ‘forego’ their bonuses, remaining firm on their salaries.  Yet, not one has taken accountability for the disaster on Wall Street due to some very bad choices made at the top.  Maybe all of their bonuses and lavish 1-year salaries combined should be thrown into the pot to pay for these damages.  Of course this will not happen.  Sadly, the taxpayers will have to eventually pay for the bailout of these big corporations. 

On a more disturbing side note, the list of Forbes ‘America’s Top Paid CEO’s’ names Angelo R. Mozilo of Countrywide Financial at #4.  Over the past six years, Mozilo has been collecting a paycheck averaging $66 million a year.   This is most unfavorable considering the lack of responsibility Countrywide has taken on bad loans, their recent proposed sale to BofA and the bad press they have received for the biggest mass identity theft scandal thus far which includes 2 million people’s identity, loan information, social security numbers, etc. stolen by a senior Countrywide employee and sold for purposes that are still being investigated.   Unfortunately I along with many others are one of the people who received the ‘identity theft’ letter from Countrywide, so it is disturbing that Mr. Mozilo makes a healthy profit annually, while under his watch, the ship was sinking. 

 

*Numbers provided courtesy of Forbes CEO list and salaries based on stock and cash annual totals combined.   Information links below to just a few of the articles noted in the fact gathering.

Morgan Stanley John Mack

http://www.forbes.com/home/business/2006/07/21/mack-ubs-sec-fund-cx_lm_0721mack.html/

JP Morgan Chase James Dimon

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9807E2D7103FF930A35752C1A96E958260

Bear Stearns James Cayne

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/business/yourmoney/08suits.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Lehman Brothers Richard Fuld Jr.

http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSN1341059120080914?pageNumber=3&virtualBrandChannel=10272

Goldman Sachs Lloyd Blankfein

http://news.hereisthecity.com/news/business_news/5646.cntns

Merrill Lynch John Thain

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122170340100750899.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Countrywide

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-arrest2-2008aug02,0,7330731.story



About the Author

Lila M. is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the author's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become an author!

20 comments on The Banking Crisis CEO's & Salaries

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Lila M. on September 19, 2008 at 07:51 pm

please excuse the formatting of this article.  when I uploaded it got all weird.  hope you can still make it out.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By El G on September 19, 2008 at 08:04 pm

The CEOs of companies such as these tend to be simple figureheads, symbols and brand names.  That’s how the salaries are justified.

Did you happen to check out the execs at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae?  They make these guys look like Gandhi (and they're buddy-buddy with Obama and Biden).  A strong case can be made that this whole mess (starting with the mortgage crisis and extending to the financial markets) began with liberal white guilt under the Bubba & Hillary regime.  It was then the Freddie and Fannie started to relax their standards for the securitized mortgages they bought, paving the way for lenders to drop their standards for borroweres.  The thinking here was that EVERYONE should be able to buy a house.  Houses are cool!  Why not?!  Drop those standards and house the great unwashed… and maybe get their votes.  The populist dream gone awry again.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Jen on September 19, 2008 at 08:39 pm

There is no justification for those bloated salaries.  Gross.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Lila M. on September 19, 2008 at 09:01 pm

EL G – “paving the way for lenders to drop their standards for borrowers”…This is exactly what happened…they accepted bigger paychecks, while letting their guard down....giving anyone/everyone a loan knowing the dire consequences.

btw I did in fact check offenders Fannie & Freddie salaries:

Fannie – Daniel Mudd, $8 million

Freddie – Richard Syron, $20 million

Jen – Yes, you really can't understand how/why they make so much.  And it's unsettling that both candidates are seeking the economic advice of these CEO’s in their campaigns. 

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By 'Mean' Mike Duffau on September 19, 2008 at 10:30 pm

all those bums do is think about money and how to stick it to everybody else!

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By AmyO on September 20, 2008 at 01:25 am

It is pretty much guaranteed that these CEO's are going to get their bonuses when all is said and done. Those bonuses should be sent to the government to pay for the bailouts or the people whose retirement accounts have been hurt by this. Hank Greenberg said his fortune has been "devestated" by what happened with AIG because he lost $3.2 billion. Maybe he can sell of some of his houses or cars to make ends meet now. Most Americans do not have that luxury. 

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By Julian Gallo on September 20, 2008 at 09:56 am

There is a lot of blame to go around regarding this mess.  I am not knowledgable about economics by any means but all I know is that there have been a lot of people around who could not afford to buy homes who were getting mortgages (I actually know someone personally where this was the case) and yet it was like, "here you go.  Go have fun and buy that half-million dollar home although you make less than $50,000 a year.  Only trouble could come from that.  It was all greed...from all sides of this mess.  The CEOs and those who would stand to make tons of money from all this as well as those who wanted desperately to "buy into" the American Dream, regardless if they could afford it.  Something was bound to break at some point.  Like I said, I no almost nothing about economics, but even I had the sense to know that on my salary there was no way I could ever afford to by a house, a co-op or a condo and expect to be able to pay for it. 

This problem goes back a long way...with all the deregulation and lack of oversight.  People have been talking about this for years but were often mocked, dismissed, as they usually are when things are "going good".  The chickens have now come home to roost. 

The funny thing about it all though is watching these advocates of deregulation now calling for it and these folks who are so against the government bailing out anything and anyone now ready for the huge government hand out.  They're against welfare but not corporate welfare.  Always interesting to me.  There wasn't enough money to provide health care to poor children but somehow there is plenty of money to bail out all these banks and corporations.  But I suppose it has to be done to fix this mess.  I suspect this is not the end of it.  It's going to be interesting to see how this massive bailout is going to play out across the board.  Some are saying that it may be close to a trillion dollars of taxpayers money in order to do this.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Lila M. on September 20, 2008 at 02:13 pm

MM & Amy – Thanks, I appreciate your worthy comments.

Julian - you bring up some brilliant points.  I too know a person who bought a house that they couldn’t afford and also a guy who got sucked into working for those smarmy fly by night lenders.  To him, it was an easy job because “anyone” was a candidate, whether bad credit, no credit, previous foreclosure….whatever the case, he was told to make it work.  And the banks would approve these people who often would make less than $40K a year, with no money down, etc.  Unbelievable.  So I blame both sides, those people who bit off more than they could chew knowing they couldn’t repay and the greedy banks and lenders who just kept handing out loans like it was free turkey dinner at a homeless shelter.  

And yes it’s funny how government does not have funds for important things like healthcare, but low and behold here’s $700 billion dollars they just happen to have to bail out these bloated corporations….ultimately on our dime. 

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Julian Gallo on September 20, 2008 at 09:54 pm

it’s funny how government does not have funds for important things like healthcare, but low and behold here’s $700 billion dollars they just happen to have to bail out these bloated corporations….ultimately on our dime. 

Incredible, isn't it?  What I wonder now is that obviously they are going to have to get this money from the taxpayers.  How?  Where are they going to get it from exactly?  Also, how is this going to effect the plans and proposals each of the candidates have?  Where is this money going to come from now?  I'd love to hear that from each of them.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 3
By Morgana on September 23, 2008 at 08:27 pm

Good article and comments.

What do you think of this idea being floated for a federal law that private sector execs can not get paid more than the highest paid public sector exec, currently the President, at $400k?

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Julian Gallo on September 23, 2008 at 08:38 pm

I'm not sure that's going to fly.  I think that may be stepping over the line, don't you?  I think if people earn their money honestly then I don't see a problem with someone making millions a year.  I think the problem here is that these guys get greedy and loot everything and then pay themselves immense salaries off this looting---like what the Enron executives did.   If their salaries are made honestly, then I don't have a problem with that. 

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Morgana on September 24, 2008 at 04:50 pm

Prez is not the highest feasting at the public trough it turns out.  USAF Coach Troy Calhoun gets $600,000.  US Army Coach Stan Brock gets $650,000.  Navy Coach Ken Niumatalolo gets $750,000. 

http://www.coacheshotseat.com/SalariesContracts.htm

Lila, there should be an ANGELO MOZILO ARREST WATCH.  His days ought to be numbered.  Cheaters Among Us, Barry

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Lila M. on September 24, 2008 at 06:40 pm

Julian - Great points.  I really want to know what exactly these guys do to warrant/deserve $20-80 million a year?   It's just so absurd, I really want to see their daily itinerary & list of duties.   

Morgana - thank you for the comments, and yes, I can only hope that they investigate Mozilo for his negligence.  It's just unacceptable that we put our money, faith and livelihood in the system and in these companies, while their negligent CEO's wipe their behinds with our hard earned cash.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Morgana on September 24, 2008 at 06:53 pm

Depressingly, Tournament Theory says that CEO’s pay is entirely unconnected to CEO performance.  Ergo, the CEO is not part of the productive flow.  CEO’s are solely a cost of business.  CEO’s, since about 1980, have become mere public figureheads, like the Queen.  CEO’s and their lifestyles are there solely to display a corporation or country’s prestige/wealth/ego/hubris/thumb of their nose to the cubicle serfs, and incidentally, customers and stockholders. 

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 2
By Julian Gallo on September 24, 2008 at 06:56 pm

Lila: They probably don't do much of anything other than "managing other people's money".  The one thing about all this is that these guys never lose.  If you gain or lose money, they get their commissions anyway so they gain no matter what.  I really can't say for sure what they "do" exactly but from what I understand it's just moving money around from one place to another, running the corp, etc.   It always amazed me how people---like teachers, for example----are paid such a pittance for something I feel is far more important to society than gambling in the stock market.  But that's our society.  Money trumps all.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By El G on September 24, 2008 at 07:18 pm

Lila:

Perhaps Barak Obama understands what these people do to merit their compensation since he hired two of them into his elite crew of top economic advisors.

Frank “Affirmative Action Hire” Raines was CEO of Fannie prior to Mudd (who, along with Syron are now long gone).  He was put into Fannie to help enact Clinton’s dream of a home in every pot.  He and his predecessor, Jim Johnson, did a lot more than simply let their guard down while they collected fat checks.  They proactively created an insolvent lending environment.  They lowered standards so low-income and “disadvantaged” people could have access to loan funds they never would have qualified for under normal conditions... the elist liberal socialist utopia mumbo jumbo.  The more shitty loans lenders made, the bigger Fannie’s portfolio, the bigger the CEO bonus.  

Raines has to leave Fannie in 2005 amid an ethics scandal.  In the meantime, he pocketed over $91 million, mostly through bogus bonuses.  He’s now under investigation by federal regulators for cooking Fannie’s books.  And this is Obama’s CURRENT go-to guy for economic advice (reminiscent of his former go-to guy for spiritual advice, Reverend Wright). 

Obama made the other Fannie sleaze, Johnson, the head of his VP search committee.  Johnson was also the guy John Kerry used to find Reille Hunter’s boy-toy, John Edwards.  Given trophies such as Fannie Mae and John Edwards, is it any wonder Obama hired him?

Bullet point from above comment:  Obama has 2 of the people most responsible for the collapse of Fannie Mae on his staff of top economic advisors.  Hope and Change.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By Julian Gallo on September 25, 2008 at 05:53 am

McCain's got people from these companies on his campaign as well.  Believe me, there's no shortage of hobnobbing going on here....as usual.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Joseph M on September 26, 2008 at 12:16 pm

McCain finally agreed to go to Miss iss i ppi (love saying the letters as I type that...) to debate.  What a trooper, he must have got a phone call from Katie Couric this morning saying "Look man, do something..."

It must be said that watching Obama's meteoric rise JUST before the housing/mortgage bust was so obvious.  His rise and reach is so similar to that of my bank, WAMU, and though I knew WAMU was too good to be true (banking there has always been just too easy) I have always kept the two in close comparison for some reason.

I wonder if a new financier will purchase Obama any time soon...

That said, for all the heat he's taken from folks on this site, I doubt I would have doubted Obama as harshly since February had it not been for an Elg critique when there were few critical articles at that time (certainly none here at Broowaha).  There is no difference between O and Mac and now I bank with Chase again after tearing up their credit card I had in 2001.

Hope Generator

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By El G on September 26, 2008 at 04:31 pm

Joe, you are to be praised for recognizing my great vision and wisdom, however, you are to be chastised for NOT recognizing the extent of it.  I wrote my first article criticizing Obama in February of 2007, the Feb. ’08 article was just a booster shot.  It was then that I realized Obama was an empty suit celebrity with a messiah complex.  The rest of the country is finally catching up.

Julian, you’re right.  Obama doesn’t have exclusive claim to Fannie/Freddie contamination, but he does have the lion’s share of it between the candidates.  It’s Obama, not McCain who is second on the list of Senators receiving Fannie contributions (Lib Chris Dodd is #1); and it’s Obama, not McCain who has two former Fannie CEOs as top economic advisors.  It was Obama's, not McCain's, VP nominee who was recommended by a former Fannie CEO.

BTW: Here’s a good clip of Obama talking economics without a teleprompter:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxBX8sz3tO8

In any case, philosophical blame in the mortgage mess is more important than personal blame.  Again, this is this socialist idea that everyone is somehow entitled to a house.  President Jimmy first started this abortion with the Community Reinvestment Act in 1977 (Habitat for Humanity for every American), then Bubba beefed it up in 1995.  Economically braindead, feel-good, leftist, white guilt policy that was doomed from the start.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Morgana on September 27, 2008 at 03:57 pm

re: Countrywide’s illegal access of computers containing personal identification information of Countrywide Home Loan customers and the illegal sale of the data; it was Countrywide employee Rene L. Rebollo Jr. that sold the privileged info.

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us






x

x