REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Last Update: 7:10am

Just Do The Required Home Loan Modification

by Morgana (writer), September 12, 2008

Credit:

Uncle Sam says Home Loan Modifications are the required way to avoid foreclosure, but the mortgage lenders are NOT willingly doing them. Why?

Home borrowers are facing foreclosure that shouldn’t be.  Senator McCain blames home loan lenders .  Home loan lenders are NOT doing the REQUIRED Note Modification.  Instead, irrational lenders are illegally doing Foreclosures and Short Sales in violation of their own rules.  

Home owners must force their lender to do the REQUIRED Note Modifications. 

The required immediate Note Modification gives homeowners time until the housing market recovers, the economy recovers, homeowners’ credit can start being repaired to its previous flawless condition, and do NOT add to the already bloated for sale/rent housing inventory. That’s why HUD, Freddie and Fannie had their foreclosure mitigation requirements, and Congress and the President signed foreclosure mitigation legislation into law. 

FOR HOME LOANS SOLD TO FREDDIE MAC 

In May 2007, Freddie Mac REQUIRED loan modifications to AVOID foreclosures. 

From Freddie Mac’s website: “As the real estate market continues to change in many areas of the country, many borrowers who are facing financial hardship are finding it increasingly difficult to make their mortgage payments, which may result in jeopardized credit and even loss of their home.  But help is available.  We offer many alternatives to explore with borrowers who are delinquent on their mortgage payments.  For borrowers who face foreclosure, it’s reducing the borrower's note rate or monthly payment, or extending the maturity date, and a loan modification is a possible option for a borrower in default.” 

FOR HOME LOANS SOLD TO FANNIE MAE 

On October 4, 2006 , Fannie Mae REQUIRED loan modifications to AVOID foreclosures. 

From Fannie Mae’s website:This Announcement describes an additional option now available to servicers for modifying delinquent adjustable-rate conventional mortgages and introduces new and enhanced forms for documenting modifications of both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate conventional mortgages.  In order to avoid foreclosures of delinquent mortgages, we allow servicers to modify the terms of delinquent conventional mortgages with our prior approval and that of the mortgage insurer, if any. Currently, servicers may recommend to us modifications that extend the term of the mortgage, provide for reamortization of the outstanding debt, change adjustable-rate mortgages to fixed-rate mortgages (using the current market interest rate for the remaining term of the mortgage), capitalize delinquent interest and escrow items or advances (and costs, if allowed by state law), and/or reduce the existing interest rate to the current market rate or to a below-market interest rate.” 

FHA INSURED HOME LOANS 

In 2005, HUD put forth its “FHA Loss Mitigation Program gives lenders the authority and responsibility to assist homeowners who have fallen into financial difficulties with their home mortgages. 

HUD published a final rule that dramatically increased the financial damages that HUD can seek against lenders that fail to utilize its mitigation programs. The rules provide for additional damages of triple the amount of any FHA mortgage insurance benefit claimed by a lender.

Both the positive and the negative reinforcement techniques or minimize their impact on the FHA insurance funds and homeowners themselves and are meant to prevent foreclosures.” 

In support of ALL the REQUIRED note modifications, there is the Emergency Home Ownership and Mortgage Equity Protection Act of 2007President Bush signed HR 3648, The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 .  It created a three-year exception, starting January 1, 2007, for IRS debt forgiveness on owner-occupied home loans.  "The goal of the Administration and legislators is to reduce the number of foreclosures and the need for short sales by allowing homeowners to renegotiate their loans without tax consequences." So the clock is ticking for homeowners to get their Note Modifications the lenders are REQUIRED to give them. 

I Blame Greedy Home Loan Lenders For Frightening Recession.  For years, Freddie Mac , Fannie Mae , HUD and the VA have had Foreclosure Mitigation Standards in place that REQUIRE Note Modifications. In this story, Is Your Lender A Patriot Or Terrorist?, is a sample letter to send to your lender.

The home loan lender’s continuing stupidity is Why You Should Wait To Buy A House

Do NOT do a Short Sale and do NOT let the lender foreclose on you. 

Note Modification versus Short-Sale versus Foreclosure. 

Although a Short Sale is not as damaging on the credit report as a foreclosure, the IRS has very complex tax consequences in a debt renegotiation, such as a Short Sale, or foreclosure, that are more detrimental for solvent taxpayers than those who are insolvent or bankrupt as each generates Cancellation of Debt Income.  A borrower who refinanced their home to take the cash out to buy another home, then let the first home go to foreclosure thinking they are getting off scott-free with the foreclosure, while enjoying their new home, is solvent as all they did was transfer equity, and commit Mortgage Fraud.  The first thing to establish is what the home’s basis is.  The IRS definition for basis is your investment in the home for tax purposes.  It usually starts with the cost to acquire the house.  Adjusted basis is the increase or decrease in the original basis according to certain events.  Increases to basis include but are not limited to improvements having a useful life of more than a year, assessments for local improvements, sales tax, the cost of extending utility lines to the home, legal fees such as the cost of defending or perfecting title, and zoning costs.  Decreases to basis include but are not limited to depreciation, nontaxable corporate distributions, casualty and theft losses, easements, and rebates from the seller.  IRS Pub 551 Basis of Assets is a handy reference.  Taxable gain or loss on a house is determined by the difference of the selling price/amount realized and its adjusted basis.  Recently a client of mine found out she was eligible for a $7,000 refund for the overpayment of her 2004 Federal taxes as she did not know her home she sold had a basis adjustment for the $42,000 in legal fees defending its title. 

IRC 61(a)(12) CODI, Cancellation of Debt Income other than as a gift, creates taxable income to the debtor unless an exception applies.  In a Short Sale, the lender issues a 1099-C to the IRS.  In a Short Sale example of a home, whether it be primary, second home, or third home, John bought his home in Reno in November 2004 for $290,000.  In November 2005, John refinanced to a new loan for $380,000.  Unfortunately, today its Fair Market Value is $260,000.  John can no longer make the payments due to his legal split with Mary, his spousal equivalent.  In 2007 John sells the property through a Realtor who successfully negotiated a Short Sale of $120,000 loan reduction with John’s lender, so John walked away with no immediate out-of pocket loss.  John has a $120,000 nondeductible loss (adjustment to basis) on his home.  The $120,000 principal reduction is taxable income in 2007 to John.  (rev. Rul. 82-202) It is reported as “Other Income” on Line 21 of the 1040.  If John had bought with seller-financing, there is special rule IRC 108 (e) (5).  If three conditions are met, the borrower reduces the property’s basis and does not recognize CODI. 

The IRS treats a foreclosure as a sale or exchange from which the borrower may realize gain or loss.  In a foreclosure, the lender issues a 1099-A to the IRS.  In a recourse state such as Nevada, the lender checks Box 5 as “Yes.”  The borrower is personally liable to pay any amount of the debt not covered by the property’s value.  The amount realized for borrower’s Federal gain or loss on the transaction is the smaller of debt cancelled or FMV of the transferred property. The borrower’s CODI is ordinary income if the loan balance exceeds the property’s FMV.   If John had gone to foreclosure, his adjusted basis is $290,000, the recourse debt cancelled is $380,000 and the FMV of the property is $260,000.  Here he realizes $260,000.  The cancelled debt ($380,000) up to the property’s FMV ($260,000).  Compare amount ($260,000) realized with adjusted basis ($290,000).  John has a $30,000 non-deductible loss.  He also recognizes ordinary income equal to the CODI of $120,000 ($380,000 debt cancelled less $260,000 FMV).  This $120,000 is the part of the cancelled debt not included in the amount realized. 

In a Short Sale example of a rental house, if John had bought and used the house as a rental, if John is not insolvent or bankrupt, if John can meet the required extent of his involvement, John can elect on Form 982 to exclude from gross income any income from the discharge of QRPBD (Qualified Real Property Business Debt).  IRC 108(c)(3) QRPBD includes debt 1) that was incurred or assumed in connection with real property used in trade or business and that is secured by such real property, 2) debt incurred or assumed to acquire, construct, reconstruct, or substantially improve real property used in a trade or business. IRC 108(c)(1) Income excluded for the discharge of QRPBD reduces the basis of the taxpayers depreciable real property, first to the property with the discharged debt, then to the taxpayer’s other depreciable real property proportionally, on each property’s relative adjusted basis.



About the Author

Morgana is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the author's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become an author!

18 comments on Just Do The Required Home Loan Modification

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on September 12, 2008 at 07:21 pm

Thanks for the plug to my Is Your Lender A Patriot Or Terrorist.  I’ve been trying for months to do exactly this loan modification – with Countrywide, and aren't they quite the uppity bunch of idiots.  Countrywide’s high employee turn-over rate, employee  lack of experience and training, and the overall poor morale at Countrywide, are all a hell of a bunch of obstacles to overcome!  Always the same fax number, (800) 658-0395, but never the same employee; Temena McGee, Michelle Langley, Ashley Stix, Brandon Coltin, tomorrow another name equally as inexperienced, has no training, doesn’t care, and changes the Countrywide story every damn time.

Obama “urged the government to help borrowers come out from under their mortgages.”  McCain "wants to curb the rising foreclosures nationwide."  All the government pieces are in place to avoid all these damn foreclosures, but the lenders won’t play ball by the rules.  Instead the terrorist lenders continue to drive Americans out of their homes and further drive down the house prices.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 3
By Morgana on September 16, 2008 at 03:13 pm

Thank you for reading and commenting.  Countrywide is on many people’s “sniper” list.   I forgot to mention in this story Craig’s expose of a Countrywide Reno manager in Cheaters Among Us, Barry

M.B. yes, I believe it is a form of domestic terrorism.  I also believe the call is way long overdue for a return to American pragmatism in economic policy to use government to represent the interests of the future to the present.  The public sector via laws must continue to be actively used to support and strengthen the private sector.  I don’t think we need any new laws nor do I believe that different laws would have avoided the Housing Bust.  What was needed to avoid the Housing Bust, and wasn’t done, was the enforcement of what was, and remains, already in the law! *

The Housing Bust was from the mortgage fraudsters willfully acting with reckless disregard of the truth, law or the consequences of their actions.  Those fraudsters were home loan lenders, lender’s managers, loan officers, loan processors, loan underwriters, Realtors, escrow officers, escrow company managers, title officers, title companies and their managers, mortgage brokers, appraisers, the FBI, State Attorney Generals, State Real Estate Divisions, State Mortgage Divisions, County District Attorneys, local police and sheriffs, and the National and local Association of Realtors as they all failed to follow or enforce the existing rules, laws and Codes of Ethics.

The why for the lenders not doing the required Note Modifications remains home loan lender greed resulting in the home loan lender’s tradeoff of their short-term profits from their loan origination fees in relationship to future foreclosures directly resulting from those past short-term profits.   A sale generates immediate profits o the lender in the buyer’s loan(s).  Moreover, those lender profits are an enormous amount in immediate fees per home loan.

The required Note Modification does not generate those type of fees to the lender.  That is why the proposal to refinance into a government backed, insured or subsidized loan is untenable and unconscionable.  It is swaggering jargon that confirms lender smallness and arrogance in their thinking.  It is more houses of cards, and smoke and mirrors.  A Short Sale or a refinance does NOT benefit the borrower.  NEITHER benefits the American taxpayers.  NEITHER benefits the American economy.  A Short Sale and a refinance ONLY benefit the home loan lenders.  Short Sales and refinanced strong-armed into by the lender are strong evidence for MORE Bait & Switch home loan practices.  Are decent people really that easy to manipulate?

The point is that lenders have already approved millions of Short Sales.  Lenders used these Short Sales to deliberately drive Americans out of their homes knowing they would be future homebuyers with future home loans.  Lenders created the problem and created for themselves future profits.  It was draconian.  The required Note Modification would have avoided that.  Lenders are already approving a reduction in principal aka loan forgiveness in these Short Sales.  They can do as I pointed out, the same required loan forgiveness and interest rate reduction in the required Note Modification.  Then the homeowner remains in their home.

Existing laws including but not limited to:

·        mortgage fraud under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 ,

·        Mail Fraud, Bank Fraud, Wire Fraud, Conspiracy, including RICO, and Money Laundering,

·        Realtors’ Code of Ethics,

·        Freddie Mac , Fannie Mae and HUD loan underwriting rules,

·        Corruption,

·        Intimidation and threatening witnesses,

·        in Nevada: NRS 645, NAC 645

 Report abuse


Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on November 12, 2008 at 12:26 pm

Zeroes Among Us, Greater Nevada Credit Union and Bank of America, or Heroes Among Us, Redwood Credit Union

I received this complaint from Dan & Michelle Gradl.  In my story Is Your Lender A Patriot Or Terrorist? I wrote about lenders illegally foreclosing.  Redwood Credit Union (RCU) has had that same problem.  RCU is a Patriot.  Redwood Credit Union is based out of Santa Rosa, California in Northern California.  800.479.7928, www.redwoodcu.org.  They do home mortgages in 1st and 2nd position as well as Home Equity Lines of Credit.  On their own RCU called their member’s lenders trying to get those lenders to do the required home loan modifications.  When the lenders chose to be domestic terrorists, RCU bought their member’s homes on the steps of the courthouse during the foreclosure sale.  To save their member’s homes, RCU had already negotiated a new loan with their member, allowing their members to stay in their homes.

Unfortunately, Greater Nevada Credit Union says they are separate from Greater Nevada Mortgage Services so they have not helped their members keep their homes as RCU has.  Rob Taylor is the CEO of Greater Nevada Mortgage Services, and he also is not interested in this patriotic tactic to assist the GNCU members in foreclosure to keep their home rather than lose them. 

Bank of America is also continuing to break the law by foreclosing instead of doing the required loan modifications.  They are also NOT doing what Redwood Credit Union is doing, helping out their community and country as a patriot does.

That makes Greater Nevada Credit Union and Bank of America domestic terrorists to me.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on November 17, 2008 at 04:55 pm

FDIC lays out broad home loan modification plan.

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, who spent weeks unsuccessfully lobbying Bush administration officials for the foreclosure prevention plan, unveiled her agency's proposal two days after Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson dismissed the idea of the government underwriting failing home loans.

http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/loans/loanmod/index.html

The FDIC said its plan would modify about 2.2 million mortgage loans by offering financial incentives to mortgage servicers. It would pay servicers $1,000 to cover expenses for each loan modified to the required standards, and would promise to share up to 50 percent of losses incurred if a modified loan defaults.

Eligible borrowers would include those who have missed at least two monthly payments on loans for homes they live in. Servicers would be expected to lower those borrowers' monthly payments to about 31 percent of the borrowers' monthly income.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on December 29, 2008 at 07:25 pm

This month, mortgage giant Fannie Mae began to allow borrowers facing imminent financial difficulties to immediately request loan alterations, rather than having  to be behind two or three payments.

An ambitious mass-market loan modification program recently outlined by the Federal Housing Finance Agency - overseer of Fannie Mae and another major lender, Freddie Mac - along with other banks and mortgage servicers provides help for subprime and other borrowers slipping closer to foreclosure. To be eligible, owners must prove they can make mortgage payments with up to 38 percent of their monthly gross income and show proof of their hardship. If successful, borrowers can get sizable interest-rate reductions, deferral of principal payments or loan extensions.

http://www.fhfa.gov/

 Report abuse


Log In To Vote   Score: 3
By Morgana on January 30, 2009 at 07:28 pm

ATTORNEY GENERAL ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT WITH

COUNTRYWIDE TO HELP BORROWERS FACING FORECLOSURE

Las Vegas, NV—

Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto announced today that her office has reached an agreement with Countrywide Financial that will help almost 400,000 borrowers across the nation facing foreclosure.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By Morgana on January 30, 2009 at 07:31 pm

“Our citizens are suffering from the mortgage foreclosure crisis. We lead the nation in foreclosures. My office has been working with Countrywide and the larger settlement states to bring some immediate relief for Nevada homeowners. Today, we are finalizing the details of the proposed settlement. The proposed settlement is intended to help those eligible Nevadans stay in their homes during these pressing economic times. We will have more details available in the coming days,” Masto said.

General Masto said Monday that mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp. has agreed to provide loan modifications to up to 397,000 borrowers nationwide under a settlement with Nevada and other states. Permanent relief to borrowers could equal about $7 to $8 billion nationwide, the states believe.

The tentative agreement was reached late Sunday by several states with Bank of America, which acquired Countrywide Financial on July 1, 2008.

Under the agreement, eligible subprime borrowers will be able to modify the terms of their loans to make monthly payments more affordable. Modified loan terms will vary according to the circumstances of the borrower, but they may include an automatic freeze or reduction in interest rates, conversion to fixed-term loans, and refinancing or reduction of principal owed.

Assuming every eligible borrower and investor participates, this loan modification program will provide benefits to eligible borrowers in Nevada as follows:

• Suspension of foreclosures for eligible borrowers with subprime and pay-option adjustable rate loans pending determination of borrower ability to afford loan modifications;

• Loan modifications valued at up to $219 million worth of reduced interest payments and, for certain borrowers, reduction of their principal balances;

• Waiver of late fees of up to $2.2 million;

• Waiver of prepayment penalties of up to $2.16 million for borrowers who receive modifications to, pay off, or refinance their loans;

• $3 million in payments to borrowers who are 120 or more days delinquent or whose homes have already been foreclosed; and

• Approximately $4.8 million in additional payments to borrowers who, in the future, will be unable to afford monthly payments under the loan modification program and lose their homes to foreclosure.

Countrywide said the loan modification program will be ready for implementation by December 1, 2008, and that the company would engage in proactive outreach to eligible customers by then. Countrywide also noted that foreclosure sales will not be initiated or advanced for borrowers likely to qualify until Countrywide has made an affirmative decision on a borrower’s eligibility.

The toll-free number for Countrywide subprime customers who want more information is 800-669-6607.

There also will be information soon at Countrywide’s website, www.countrywide.com.

The tentative settlement resolves allegations that Countrywide used unfair and deceptive tactics in its loan origination and servicing activities – and that borrowers often were put in structurally unfair and unaffordable loans. Countrywide is the largest provider of subprime mortgages in the U.S.

Countrywide said the loan modification program was designed to achieve affordable and sustainable mortgage payments for borrowers who financed their homes with subprime loans or pay-option adjustable rate mortgages (“ARMs”) serviced by Countrywide that were originated prior to December 31, 2007, and who are seriously delinquent or are likely to become seriously delinquent as a result of loan features, such as interest rate resets or payment recasts.

Under the settlement, which does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing, Bank of America/Countrywide also agreed to: stop offering pay option ARMs and significantly curtail offering “low-documentation” and “no-documentation” loans; initiate an early identification and contact program for people who have trouble making their payments; and continue working with non-profits, federal agencies, and state Attorneys General on ways to use REO (real estate owned) and other properties for community development.

The Bank of America/Countrywide settlement resolves investigations into Countrywide’s lending practices in Arizona, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, Texas and Washington. The settlement also resolves lawsuits against Countrywide initiated by Illinois, California and Florida. Other states also are participating in the settlement. Additional information as well as other valuable information on consumer protection, is also available on the Attorney General’s website at www.ag.state.nv.us.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 7
By Craig B on February 03, 2009 at 10:19 pm

Failure to deliver services within a reasonable time in Nevada,

Maintaining a pattern of illegal business practices in Nevada

Countrywide has failed to deliver services within a reasonable time per NRS 598.0903, et seq http://leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-598.html and  Countrywide has maintained a pattern of illegal business practices in violation of Nevada's consumer protection laws.  Now Countrywide is also violating the settlement agreement that Countrywide entered into with the State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General in December 2008.

State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General                         fax #  (775) 684-1170 
Bureau of Consumer Protection
100 North Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Edward on February 15, 2009 at 02:06 pm

February 15, 2009, Wells Fargo agrees to halt Foreclosures, temporarily..

Some lawmakers have suggested Geithner "strongly encourage" banks receiving government capital through the controversial $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, to temporarily stop foreclosures. "TARP-assisted financial institutions should allow struggling homeowners more time to qualify for any systematic loan modification plan," Frank and Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., wrote in a letter to Geithner on Wednesday.

JPMorgan, Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo each have received billions of dollars in federal aid through TARP.

htthttp://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200902131828DOWJONESDJONLINE000900_FORTUNE5.htm

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By Craig B on February 19, 2009 at 05:39 pm

My follow up to how Countrywide is really screwing us over as individuals and as a country is at http://www.babelation.com/?q=node/1730 in the piece Is Your Lender A Patriot Or Terrorist? Part 2.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By Craig B on February 19, 2009 at 05:48 pm

A follow up to my above Greater Nevada Credit Union comment"  Claude Argill is the Loss Mitigation Manager at Greater Nevada Credit Union.  E-mail him at cargill@gncu.net that Greater Nevada Credit Union should be doing what Redwood Credit Union (RCU) is doing to serve their community.

On their own RCU called their member’s lenders trying to get those lenders to do the required home loan modifications.  When the lenders chose to be domestic terrorists, RCU bought their member’s homes on the steps of the courthouse during the foreclosure sale.  To save their member’s homes, RCU had already negotiated a new loan with their member, allowing their members to stay in their homes.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 5
By Craig B on February 23, 2009 at 03:48 pm

Hey Countrywide and your four employees Temena McGee, Michelle Langley, Ashley Stix, and Brandon Coltin, the latest is that according to U.S. Treasury Department website at http://www.treas.gov/initiatives/eesa/homeowner-affordability-plan/ExecutiveSummary.pdf.Helping Hard-Pressed Homeowners Stay in their Homes: This initiative is intended to reach millions of responsible homeowners who are struggling to afford their mortgage payments because of the current recession, yet cannot sell their homes because prices have fallen so significantly. Millions of hard-working families have seen their mortgage payments rise to 40 or even 50 percent of their monthly income.

a.   Providing Loan Modifications to Bring Monthly Payments to Sustainable Levels: The Homeowner Stability Initiative has a simple goal: reduce the amount homeowners owe per month to sustainable levels. Using money allocated under the Financial Stability Plan and the full strength of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, this program has several key components:

b.    A Shared Effort to Reduce Monthly Payments: For a sample household with payments adding up to 43 percent of his monthly income, the lender would first be responsible for bringing down interest rates so that the borrower’s monthly mortgage payment is no more than 38 percent of his or her income. Next, the initiative would match further reductions in interest payments dollar-for-dollar with the lender to bring that ratio down to 31 percent. If that borrower had a $220,000 mortgage, that could mean a reduction in monthly payments by over $400. That lower interest rate must be kept in place for five years, after which it could gradually be stepped up to the conforming loan rate in place at the time of the modification. Lenders will also be able to bring down monthly payments by reducing the principal owed on the mortgage, with Treasury sharing in the costs.

c.   “Pay for Success” Incentives to Servicers: Servicers will receive an up-front fee of $1,000 for each eligible modification meeting guidelines established under this initiative. They will also receive “pay for success” fees – awarded monthly as long as the borrower stays current on the loan – of up to $1,000 each year for three years.

d.    Incentives to Help Borrowers Stay Current: To provide an extra incentive for borrowers to keep paying on time, the initiative will provide a monthly balance reduction payment that goes straight towards reducing the principal balance of the mortgage loan. As long as a borrower stays current on his or her loan, he or she can get up to $1,000 each year for five years.

e.   Reaching Borrowers Early: To keep lenders focused on reaching borrowers who are trying their best to stay current on their mortgages, an incentive payment of $500 will be paid to servicers, and an incentive payment of $1,500 will be paid to mortgage holders, if they modify at-risk loans before the borrower falls behind.

f.    Home Price Decline Reserve Payments: To encourage lenders to modify more mortgages and enable more families to keep their homes, the Administration -- together with the FDIC -- has developed an innovative partial guarantee initiative. The insurance fund – to be created by the Treasury Department at a size of up to $10 billion – will be designed to discourage lenders from opting to foreclose on mortgages that could be viable now out of fear that home prices will fall even further later on. Holders of mortgages modified under the program would be provided with an additional insurance payment on each modified loan, linked to declines in the home price index.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on February 25, 2009 at 04:11 pm

Treva J. Hearne, trevahearn@aol.com

245 East Liberty Street, Suite 110
Reno, Nevada 89501

775) 329-5800

 Fax Number: (775) 329-5819

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on February 26, 2009 at 06:56 pm

I spoke with my real estate expert, the only one in Nevada with Real Estate and Escrow Degrees, and here’s what I learned.

Beware of these Real Estate Fraud scammers/fraudsters.  Many of these Notices of Defaults being filed are just more Real Estate Fraud.  Many of these Notices of Default  are not real, they are fraudulent and they are just another way to steal houses.  Then the fraudster “sells” the stolen house under a fraudulent Trustee’s Deed.  By the time the homeowner and real and lawful lender finds out, it’s a huge legal nightmare, and the fraudsters are off with a lot of illegally obtained cash in their rotten pockets.

Too many title companies and sheriff’s offices  are just accepting at face value these Notices of Default without actually verifying them against the actual Deed of Trust as to who really has the lawful authority to foreclose.

If you get one of those dreaded Notice of Default’s filed against your home, check out the facts first.  Like is the one that filed that Notice of Default the one with the lawful authority to do so?  Guess what?  The vast majority of the time, they don’t!  They claim to have the authority, but don’t believe it.  Make them prove it to you.

If it’s not the party written in your Deed of Trust, a legal trail must be established as to how the alleged party now foreclosing is lawfully involved and has the lawful authority to do so.  That included if your loan has been sold one or more times from who you originally did the loan with.  There has to be provided to you the trail of legal transfers.

So that’s for the lender.  You’re the Trustor so it’s the same for the Trustee and the Beneficiary.  If the ones claiming to now be the Trustee and the Beneficiary are not the ones written in your Deed of Trust, these now alleged Trustee and the Beneficiary all have to legally prove how they now have lawful authority to foreclose.

Read your Deed of Trust t find out who the parties are that have legal authority to foreclose.  It will be in your closing documents you got from escrow.  If you can’t find your Deed of Trust, don’t worry.  It’s filed at the country recorder’s office.  You can either get a copy from there, or from any local title/escrow company.

Your Note will also be in your escrow docs you got when you bought the house.  NEVER give a copy your Note to the ones doing the foreclosure.  Odds are they don’t have the original let along a copy.  Without the original Note, which the one doing the foreclosing has to produce, they can’t lawfully foreclose.   The law requires the one doing the foreclosing has to produce the original note.  Make them prove to you they have the original Note.

For example, RECONSTRUCT COMPANY filed a Notice of Default.  Yet, there’s NO evidence RECONSTRUCT COMPANY has lawful authority to do what they have done, which is,

1.         According to the NOTICE OF DEFAULT, “RECORDING REQUESTED BY RECONSTRUCT COMPANY.”

RECONSTRUCT COMPANY appears instead to be engaged in fraud.  According to “Important Legal Notice NOTICE OF DEFAULT, RECONSTRUCT COMPANY, N.A., acting in its capacity as agent for the beneficiary,” alleges it’s the agent for the beneficiary and that “the Creditor to whom the debt is owed is Countrywide Home Loans.”

WRONG

1.                  RECONSTRUCT COMPANY is NOT the agent for the beneficiary.

2.                  Countrywide Home Loans is NOT the Creditor.

Here’s why:

1.                  RECONSTRUCT COMPANY has provided NO evidence that they are their claimed "agent for the beneficiary.”

2.                  According to the Deed of Trust RECONSTRUCT COMPANY references, the lender is Colonial Bank, N.A.

According to “Nevada Important Notice RECONSTRUCT COMPANY, N.A., claims to be “the duly appointed Trustee under a Deed of Trust”

WRONG

1.         Reconstruct Company is NOT the duly appointed Trustee under the referenced Deed of Trust

Here’s why:

1.                  According to the Deed of Trust RECONSTRUCT COMPANY references, the Trustee is FIRST CENTENNIAL TITLE COMPANY.

According to the Deed of Trust RECONSTRUCT COMPANY references, the “Trustee shall give public notice of the sale to the persons and in the manner prescribed by Applicable Law.”  The Trustee according to the Deed of Trust RECONSTRUCT COMPANY references, is FIRST CENTENNIAL TITLE COMPANY.  FIRST CENTENNIAL TITLE COMPANY has failed to “give public notice of the sale to the persons and in the manner prescribed by Applicable Law.”

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 5
By Craig B on June 22, 2009 at 03:52 pm

From Brandon @ BLC4law@aol.com

Beware of Loan Modification Documents -- Read Carefully!

 

Folks, as part of my ongoing misery with Countrywide -- after it failed to follow through with a loan refinancing deal because I refused to sign the loan application that CW employees completed with false information (they overstated my income and also showed me as having a $30,000 savings account when I had none at all!) -- Countrywide sent me a "loan modification" agreement. This process is apparently totally separate from any refinancing arrangements.

Supposedly, the loan modification was based on CW's discussion with the Attorneys General of various states that sued the company for fraud / deceptive trade practices. The letter I got from CW regarding the loan modification said I needed to do absolutely nothing to get a reduced interest rate and most importantly to us, a reduced monthly payment schedule. Yet when they sent the loan modification document, lo and behold, there was a paragraph in the document by which I agreed to give up any legal rights I might have against Countrywide based on alleged fraud or misconduct in refinancing. I refused to sign it. Nobody had ever mentioned that I was going to have to give up and release any claims I might have against this company. CW puts people in horrible economic circumstances, gets them over a barrel, so to speak, then knowing that a person in that position will do and sign almost anything to save the home, puts provisions in the loan modification documents to protect themselves from past lies and misconduct. How egregious is that?? Did Congress really give BOA and CW billions in funds so that the company could run roughshod over the rights of borrowers and silence their complaints of fraud and deception in the refinancing process? I think not.

The refinancing scam is going to prove more deadly to our nation than even the subprime loan origination practices that set our economy's downfall in motion. Sooner or later, the truth will come out. For those of us who are CW customers and have experienced this firsthand, there will be no surprise when it all surfaces. But it will likely be too late to reverse the damage done...

Where is the government oversight? Where is the "transparency" in Countrywide's handling of these matters that we have heard would be required of these monster corporations receiving billions from the federal government?

Note that Countrywide's attorneys -- in a court of law, mind you -- have stated that their refinancing offers are "not promises of anticipated future performance" on the company's part but are mere "puffery" ... What does this mean in plain-Jane English? It means, ladies and gentlemen, that CW's refinancing offers are absolutely meaningless. Also be aware that if your refinancing depends on an appraisal of your property, that Countrywide has been sued in the State of Washington for mortgage appraisal manipulation. Meaning, Countrywide cherry-picks appraisers to give the company the valuation that it wants, not the true valuation of your property. There are countless ways this company will scam you, defraud you and eventually send you to foreclosure.

Then of course when the refinancing fails, for whatever reason (a loan application that CW itself falsified, or a bogus appraisal on your property that results in you NOT qualifying after being promised and assured that you do), you get a loan modification document that will take away any legal rights you have against the company. BEWARE!!

Brandon

BLC4law@aol.com

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Craig B on November 30, 2009 at 08:00 pm

NV AB 149 FURTHER Requires Homeloan Modifications

Nevada legislators finally got fed up enough with the lenders illegal foreclosures and did something.

http://www.leg.state.nv.us/75th2009/Bills/AB/AB149.pdf


FEBRUARY 9, 2009

Nevada ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 149 establishes additional restrictions on the trustee’s power of sale with respect to owner-occupied housing by providing a homeowner with the right to request mediation under which he may receive a loan modification. Once a homeowner requests mediation, no further action may be taken to exercise the power of sale until the completion of the mediation. Each mediation must be conducted by a senior justice, judge, hearing master or other designee pursuant to rules adopted by the Nevada Supreme Court or an entity designated by the Nevada Supreme Court.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Chapter 107 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:
1. In addition to the requirements of NRS 107.085, the exercise of the power of sale pursuant to NRS 107.080 with respect to any trust agreement to which NRS 107.085 applies and which concerns owner-occupied housing is subject to the provisions of this section.

2. The trustee shall not exercise a power of sale pursuant to NRS 107.080 unless the trustee includes in the notice required by subsection 2 of NRS 107.085:

(a) Contact information which the grantor may use to reach a person with authority to negotiate a loan modification on behalf of the trustee;

(b) Contact information for at least one local housing counseling agency approved by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; and

(c) A form upon which the grantor may indicate his election to enter into mediation or to waive mediation and one envelope addressed to the trustee and one envelope addressed to the Administrative Office of the Courts, which the grantor may use to comply with the provisions of subsection 3.

3. The grantor shall, not later than 30 days after service of the notice in the manner required by NRS 107.085, complete the form required by paragraph (c) of subsection 2 and return the form to the trustee by certified mail, return receipt requested. If the grantor indicates on the form his election to enter into mediation, the trustee shall file a copy of the form with the Administrative Office of the Courts, which shall assign the matter to a senior justice, judge, hearing master or other designee and schedule the matter for mediation. No further action may be taken to exercise the power of sale until the completion of the mediation. If the grantor indicates on the form his election to waive mediation or fails to return the form to the trustee as required by this paragraph, no mediation is required.

4. Each mediation required by this section must be conducted by a senior justice, judge, hearing master or other designee pursuant to the rules adopted pursuant to subsection 7. The trustee or his representative and the grantor or his representative shall each attend the mediation. The trustee shall bring a copy of the deed of trust and the mortgage note to the mediation. If the trustee is represented at the mediation by another person, that person must have authority to negotiate a loan modification on behalf of the trustee or have access at all times during the mediation to a person with such authority.

5. If the trustee or his representative fails to attend the mediation, does not bring to the mediation each document required by subsection 4 or does not have the authority or access to a person with the authority required by subsection 4, the court may issue an order requiring a loan modification in the manner determined proper by the court.

6. If the grantor fails to attend the mediation, the court shall dismiss the matter and the mediation shall be deemed completed for the purposes of this section.

7. The Supreme Court or an entity designated by the Supreme Court shall adopt rules necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us






x

x