There are some facts missing from this story, that would help with the analysis.  Here's some information that may clear things up a bit though...

1.  Most restraining orders are issued at a preliminary hearing, at this stage they are temporary, and then there is a more formal where more evidence and witnesses can be presented later on; usually weeks later.

2. The Supreme's didn't say gun prohibition was illegal in all cases, rather they said that individual citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.  For example, I doubt this ruling will affect the right of a felon on parole to have a gun...

3. In California, gun prohibitions in restraining orders usually only fall into the DV (Domestic Violence) restraining order, and in these cases they are typically warranted.  The Court's attitude is that it is better to be safe than sorry.

4. Did the wife use certified mail?  She may not have submitted her opposition in time, but even then, there should have been a follow-up hearing scheduled.

5. The Courts of the various 50 states can obtain jurisdiction through two mechanisms: first is the "Full Faith and Credit Clause" of the US constitution, which requires states to respect and enforce the laws of other states, and second, is the fact that the California courts will notify the Nevada courts, which will then grant the power to enforce the ruling against the Nevada Citizen. 

Nothing happens automatically.  As a Deputy Sheriff you should appreciate the cooperation between states.  I'm sure you've arrested individuals wanted outside of Nevada and watched them shipped out of state. 

 Report abuse

It really needs to be a case by case basis - because here you have a woman who clearly needs to protect herself, but on the other hand there are psycho’s out there also with restraining orders.   I absolutely feel it is necessary to protect with a gun and I follow suit as well.   But in general it really needs to be a per case situation when it comes to guns and restraining ordered individuals.  

 Report abuse

Craig: Thanks for the plug.  Good point here but still it is not within the power of California to restrict the wife's right to own a gun when she is 250 miles away in another state.  It is certainly within the right of the California court to notify the Nevada court in Reno, but beyond, that, it is Nevada state law, not California that rules on her behavior in Reno.  Now if she sets foot in California with a gun, I can see something coming of it.

But since I don't know the in's and out's of California and Nevada domestic dispute law, I'll stop here.

 Report abuse

Reza – good points however . . .

1.  You wrote that “Most restraining orders are issued at a preliminary hearing, at this stage they are temporary, and then there is a more formal where more evidence and witnesses can be presented later on; usually weeks later.”  Didn’t happen here.  In my story: “According to those court papers . . . a court hearing was scheduled for a temporary restraining order against wife.   Illegally, husband gets a 3-year default restraining order against wife.”  There was NO other hearing.  There was only that ONE hearing for the temporary order that morphed into the illegally issued 3 year order.

2. You wrote that “The Supreme's didn't say gun prohibition was illegal in all cases, rather they said that individual citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.  For example, I doubt this ruling will affect the right of a felon on parole to have a gun...”  Correct.  The woman here IS a citizen, NOT a felon.  She has NO criminal history.  Yet, she was illegally denied her constitutional civil right to keep and bear arms.

3. You wrote that “In California, gun prohibitions in restraining orders usually only fall into the DV (Domestic Violence) restraining order, and in these cases they are typically warranted.  The Court's attitude is that it is better to be safe than sorry.”  It is my experience that a restraining order against the woman is very very rare, and never have I heard of the woman being deprived of her right to defend herself from a man with the several history of violence, abuse, lying, instability, and double-life that this husband has.

4. You wrote that “Did the wife use certified mail?  She may not have submitted her opposition in time, but even then, there should have been a follow-up hearing scheduled.”  Correct.”  Didn’t happen here.  In my story: “According to those court papers . . . a court hearing was scheduled for a temporary restraining order against wife.   Illegally, husband gets a 3-year default restraining order against wife.”  There was NO other hearing.  There was only that ONE hearing.  Furthermore, as I wrote “it is illegal for service to be 36 hours before a court hearing.  Therefore, husband, his attorney and/or the Marin County courts falsified the date of service.”

5. You wrote that “The Courts of the various 50 states can obtain jurisdiction through two mechanisms: first is the "Full Faith and Credit Clause" of the US constitution, which requires states to respect and enforce the laws of other states, and second, is the fact that the California courts will notify the Nevada courts, which will then grant the power to enforce the ruling against the Nevada Citizen.”  Didn’t happen here.   In my story: “According to those court papers . . .  NO Nevada court had anything to do with the California restraining order!  No Nevada court was ever notified.  NO Nevada court ever issued any ruling to “grant the power to enforce the ruling against the Nevada Citizen.”

I’ve never been a Nevada Deputy Sheriff  so I’ve never “arrested individuals wanted outside of Nevada and watched them shipped out of state.”  Nor did I ever see it, when I was a Deputy Sheriff in California, for an out of state illegally obtained order, or for any out of state restraining order.  People who live a couple hundred miles away, a five or so hour drive through heavily populated metropolitan areas, just don’t go to the bother of doing the drive.  Especially when they have a driving disability as this woman does.

Lila, also good points.  This poor woman in this case didn’t even get her “case by case basis.”

Morgana, if you mean arrows in my back for investigative reporting, yes, that has been happening.  If you mean arrows in this poor woman’s back, definitely.

D.E., also good points.  You’re welcome for the plug as you certainly deserved it for that story.  You wrote “It is certainly within the right of the California court to notify the Nevada court in Reno, but beyond, that, it is Nevada state law, not California that rules on her behavior in Reno. “  Didn’t happen here.   In my story: “According to those court papers . . .” No Nevada court had anything to do with the California restraining order!  NO Nevada court was ever notified.  “Most liberal Marin County Ca has repeatedly thumbed their nose at the US Constitution, then imposed their illegal actions onto a Nevada citizen. What's next?”

Reno Police Officer Brandon Neagle (neagleb@ci.reno.nv.us), neighbor Brice Clement (771-7867), neighbor Chip & Mary (972-5670) and neighbor Jan (972-5432), all saw the severe damage caused by the break-in and the ransacking.  Pat Slavin (pslavin@tmcc.edu) and the Truckee Meadows Community College Police saw the attempted break-in at the college.

Another thing is that this husband refused to take any action against Cindy Wood for the restraining order and judgment awarded for Ms. Wood’s harassment (police trapped phone calls) of him and this Mrs. Olson at their then Sausalito, California home.

 Report abuse

I got this message from a Brooster about this story.  “It sounds like a pretty nasty situation Craig, and one that is ripe for an appeal.  I'm not sure how long ago this happend, but I would recommend that she contact some of the Law Schools in the area to be directed to attorneys that would take up her appeal on a pro bono basis. “

I just came back from Marin County, California where I had done some more sleuthing and discovered some other things that were just plain wrong, illegal and unethical.  The damn California lawyer that the Nevada Mrs. Olson hired to defend her against her husband’s Marin County red-herring (a technique used in literature to mislead the audience, a logical fallacy in which one purports to prove one's point by means of irrelevant arguments) lawsuits is one Michael B. Samuels.  Counselor Samuels somehow took, kept and spent Mrs. Olson’s several thousands of dollars as his legal retainer without ever disclosing to her that he became and remained good friends with her husband, James K. Olson, who was Counselor Samuel’s children’s music teacher!!

 Report abuse

I got this message from a Brooster about this story.  "That sounds like an ethical violation at the least.  She should contact the state bar: www.calbar.org."

 Report abuse

Unethical?!  Yeah! Looks also like this Michael B. Samuels is one s.o.b.in thief among us.  I don't get how California can take do this!

 Report abuse

Nevada's ACLU state affliate is ACLU of Northern California
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, CA 94111

 Report abuse

They shoot lawyers don't they?

 Report abuse

Maryam, welcome aboard!  If only we could shoot the lawyers.

 Report abuse

Thanks for the ACLU info.  Whether "we" can shoot the lawyers or not is a moot point for many who just shoot the lawyer anyway.  There is a long history of that happening.

Maryam, for some reason you remind me of Blazzing Saddles.  “Mongo only pawn ...  in game of life. “ “My name is Jim, but most people call me . . . Jim.”

 Report abuse

Morgana, that cheeky :) broad, I see is out again practicing her "kindness makes friends out of strangers."  Many Broosters articles has she brought to my attention, others attention and my and others' articles to their attention. She has turned into the Broo Goodwill Ambassador :)

 Report abuse

Man, this article as of today has been e-mailed 439 times.  That is the most of any of my stories.

 Report abuse

Screw that Marin County judge. The blog world is NOT a relatively powerless echo chamber.

Internet-based liberal activist’s have outed the identities of the villains and traitors.  Craig’s stories reach because there are clear distinctions between good and evil.  In our so-loved entertainment culture, these type of powerful stories are what sustains citizen involvement.  The postings of this outrage and the compiling up of rap sheets broke the stillness and reinforces the narrative.  The Internet hum of discontent is growing.  The wave grows until it crashes into the national consciousness.

Craig’s exposes are on-going soap-operas, narrative, entertainment of the highest order.  Nothing more American than that.

I myself have been exploring mediums as I find my voice.  I have been derisively attacked as an amateur, code word for not a gatekeeper.  I have been told I have a stupid opinion or an opinion I should keep to myself, in other words, to stop complaining.  Well, I am not going to “stop complaining.”  In fact, I will continue to make my voice seen and heard.  @ you gatekeepers: I will either bypass, crush or influence you.

When my enemies began to notice m and to attack me, then I have arrived.  I feed their backlash.

The comfortable and established are more invested in holding their perceived positions of privilege than in risking new ways of writing, thinking, innovating, exploring, and governing.  Hence, we have been cursed with a system that doesn’t always reward the greatest talents, truth or ethics.  Instead of meritocracy, we’ve had more of an economic and political aristocracy.  No more.  I can fact check, break stories and feed stories,

Technology has allowed all that.  The Internet is educating the ignorant.  The result is democratization.  The vast choices of communication on the Internet means more and more people are increasingly becoming active participants in their culture. 

Instead of complaining about the self-entitled corporate flavor of music, films or even politics, we are making our own music, films and politics.  Without asking anyone’s permission, we have bypassed the gatekeepers and boy are they po’d about that.  So, they fight back to remain the self-perceived elite.  They’ve lost.  They’ve lost because bloggers exert a disproportionate pressure on politics and in highlighting injustice.

No more will only certain kinds of people be allowed to speak up or to each other.   I can be as equally belligerent as the GOP in my HATRED of the Illegal and Immoral Iraq War and my OPPOSITION to the Illegal and Immoral Iraq War supporters.  I label the Illegal War supporters as un-American.  I have nothing but contempt for the GOP.  My zeal matches any extreme right-wing nut job.  I will relentlessly mock and deride the far-right nut jobs paranoid fantasies.  I am a reformist.  I am a noncorporatist.  I am a liberal.  I am a progressive. I am an Illegal and Immoral Iraq War opponent.  I am proud to be a liberal.  I am a GOP’s intolerance foe. I will take every stunt from the far right nut wing jobs and apply them to my causes, including scapegoating villains de jour.  I make no apologies for being liberal or an Internet-based liberal activist.

Without a hint of regret, I NO longer read with amusement the lunacy and hypocrisy of the far right wing nut jobs.  At one time far right nut wing jobs made “nice copy,“ but they didn’t then and they don’t now, reflect reality.  I have copied from the far right nut wig jobs and with equal to there mean-spirited vengeance, fight for my liberal beliefs.  The far right nut wing jobs have been dislodged and liberals have filled in the gaps.  Now I go for the gut, not the brain.  I say the far right wing nut jobs are shrill and unstable.  Now I use their own quotes against them, equally taunting and smearing them.  The weirder and weirder the far right nut wing jobs and the corrupt and crooks get, the more material they are just writing for me.

Screw them.

Screw the GOP.  Screw Cheaters Among Us, Homier.  Screw Cheaters Among Us, Kings.  Screw Cheaters Among Us, Gledhill. Screw Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts.   Screw Flip Flop Rers Among Us, James K. Olson.  Screw Troop Haters Among Us, Dr. Angelini.  Screw Bizarre Among Us, Realtor Newman.  Screw Bri's Rapist & Murderer.  Screw  Zeroes Among Us, Bank Of America.  Screw Contempt Among Us, Hopson.  Screw Cheaters Among Us, Barry.  Screw Culprits Among Us, Clark.  Screw Bullies Among Us, Mapes.  Screw Cheaters Among Us, Homier.  Screw Outlaws Among Us, Zane.  Screw Zeroes Among Us, Scheible.  Screw Cheaters Among Us, Maree.  Screw Cheaters Among Us, Sickler.  Screw  Nevada Real Estate Division.

I know I’ve paraphrased Daily Kos.  I thank Daily Kos.

 Report abuse

Good points, Joan.  The Internet has become a common ground for sharing viewpoints, both pro and con. As more people are tuned in to the electronic age it has become increasingly more difficult for the bad practices of any business or person, no matter how remote or small their marketplace or sphere of influence is, to continue without being noticed, as has been the case until now. People of all levels and of experience have increasingly begun to share their opinions concerning the various pluses and minuses of various businesses and people. Many businesses and people are not coming out well in these news group discussions and blogs.

Internet media has the ability to present new, or previously suppressed, news. 

Everyday consumers of goods and services now have the Internet to describe their experiences with businesses and those businesses’ employees.  Government executives, administrators and all government employees, businesses, both non-profit and profit, legal and not legal, and every single one of their owners and employees, and all religious participants are ever increasingly more vulnerable to exposure, and accountability.

Consumers have become bolder that their payment means total accountability for what consumers paid for.  Consumers are less likely to keep to their place, do as they’re told and keep their opinions to themselves.   Today’s governments, businesses or religions that dismiss or ignore consumers do so at their own risk. The Internet is free at public libraries, free at many businesses and free to anyone that wants to crawl on to it from a nearby wireless connection.  Consumers of these goods and services more often than not relate bad experiences over good experiences.   Exercising their freedom of speech rights where legal and illegal, they not only spell out and link the offending business’ name and location, but also the offending employees and/or owner’s names and locations.  They spell out in great detail, and link with supporting documentation, their complaints.

I am glad to see “Gone are the days where settings from Auschwitz to Abu Ghraib contaminated in isolation both superiors and subordinates.”  I am glad “the Internet is real-time exposure forcing attention, and repercussions.”  I am glad “The result has been an increase in holding others accountable, just saying no and exposes.” 

Governments, schools, teachers, businesses, attorneys, judges, Realtors, home loan lenders, doctors, mechanics, hospitals, religions, etc. should be “relentlessly interviewed, closely monitored, increasingly resisted, and constantly scrutinized.” 

“Online exposes and nastiness” happen for a reason.  Reasons like bad customer service or injustice.  “As the realization sinks in that the Internet is also a real time conduit of one’s reputation,” customer service will be deliberately forced to get only better.

I have come to the recent conclusion that the Internet has made the Better Business Bureau a dinosaur.  The BBB does not publish what the complaint is, and without that, the complaint is useless.  Complaints made to the BBB about businesses not providing goods and services as advertised or legally required, bar associations about lawyers lying and taking client’s money but not doing what they were paid to do, Realtor associations about Realtors clearly violating written ethics rules, ethics committees, commissions, etc. should not be private.  Instead, all should be public.  But they’re not.

That’s another reason why there is an increase on the Internet of complaints and exposes.  Too often, ranks have closed in around an offending member and protected them rather than hold them accountable.  Or worse, the accused makes threats against the complaintant and witnesses, or bribes are offered by the accused and accepted by the investigator(s), prosecutors and/or judges.  The Internet is the medium to not only expose the offending member, but also these cover ups by those paid to investigate, judge and punish offenders.

Public records are public to protect the public.  That’s why our publicly elected officials voting records are public.  That’s why publicly elected officials can only have public meetings “putting their opinions and conclusions easily available to everyone.”  That’s why all complaints, investigations and outcomes should be public.

 Report abuse

Californicating Nevada - How Nevada Gets The California Boot.  In my research, I found that the Reno Mrs. Olson is not compulsive, delusional or obsessive.  Rather what I found is puzzling, saddening and infuriating that law and justice are arbitrary, changeable, susceptible to the lies and deceit of lawyers and the whims of the judges, defined by mere commercial expediency.  Surely the world is ran by higher priorities than deceit and whims and California’s commerce?

Surely it not.  Why should anybody be allowed to retain obsolete fashion?  Truth and justice must go.  They went.  California’s commerce and conversance must be served.  Lawyers and judges are whores.

The Reno Mrs. Olson protested mightily.  But there is a war on, don’t you know?  Mr. James “Jim” K. Olson’s War.  Mr. Olson’s War to impose silence, destruction, death and annihilation on his Reno Mrs. Olson.  Mr. Olson’s conflict is desperate.  Evidence for the justification for Mr. Olson’s War is non-existent, but anything can be put over by deceitful smug lawyers when there is a lazy, corrupt, unpatriotic or incompetent judge.

You listening Nevadan Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook?  Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook are the lazy, corrupt, unpatriotic or incompetent Reno Californicated judges that both threw a Nevada citizen to the California whores and under the wheels of the California bus (DV 07-00352 and FV 07-00748).  Let’s see if Reno Nevadan Judge Brent Adams or Judge Greg W. Zive are as lazy, corrupt, unpatriotic or incompetent Californicators (CV 08-01067 and BK 08-51146).  You listening Nevadan Judge Brent Adams? You listening Nevadan Judge Greg W. Zive? You listening Nevadans Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook?

With great amusement do I point out that Mr. James “Jim” K. Olson hides his bigamy, Reno Nevada homeowners and landlord’s insurance, Nevada Trust, Reno Nevada ownership of house, etc. under his hairshirt.  Mr. James “Jim” K. Olson emphasizes his lie he’s an innocent victim rather than the truth.  Jim Olson and his Marin County, California lawyer buddies, Steven T. Schoonover and Michael B. Samuels victimized the Reno Mrs. Olson, forging her into a twisted bogeyman.   Mr. James “Jim” K. Olson’s California lawyer buddies, Steven T. Schoonover and Michael B. Samuels, kept whipping the disobedient Reno Mrs. Olson into judicial line when she failed to follow their orders to just shut up and go quietly away.

If Jim Olson’s California lawyer buddies, Steven T. Schoonover and Michael B. Samuels could convince the California courts to forcibly alter the truth would it also not compel their attack on a Nevada citizen, which the Reno Mrs. Olson was and is.  You bet your life, reputation, sanity and finances it would.  By now, Nevada’s wrinkled crones and cowlick hillbillies were not allowed to play in the California courts.  Nevadans and the rest of America are just supposed to have been thoroughly Californicated.  Is it not only desirable by Californians, but inevitable, that those who do not come in will be left out in the cold?

I beg to differ.  Come now, it’s really not all that chilly here in Nevada.  Here in Nevada we still believe that the power of the legislator and judge is limited over the will and action of the people. Lessons anyone? The God of Californication is never sated is he?  You listening Nevadan Judge Brent Adams? You listening Nevadan Judge Greg W. Zive? You listening Nevadans Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook?  You listening Nevadans Judges Steve Elliott and Fidel Salcedo (enablers of Mortgage Fraudster Californian Californicator Keith W. Gledhill)?

I remind Nevadan Judge Brent Adams, Nevadan Judge Greg W. Zive, Nevadans Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook, and Nevadans Judge Steve Elliott and Fidel Salcedo that there is only one policy and law compatible with a healthy Nevada family life.  That is one of non-intervention from California and California residents who see our fine state of Nevada as a bunch only populated by the lazy, corrupt, unpatriotic or incompetent who can not govern or try Nevada’s own that Nevada has to demand that California do so for Nevada.

Wrong.  I despise California’s vulgar, home-wrecking and even attempted murderous intrusions in Nevada.  It’s even more despicable when a Nevada hating Reno Judge, Frances Doherty, demands California courts judge Nevada citizens such as James “Jim” K. Olson and his Reno wife.  Nevada Judges Brent Adams and Greg W. Zive, prove you are smarter and more patriotic of your home state of Nevada.  Don’t let James “Jim” K. Olson Californicate you as he did Nevadan haters Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook.  Or how Mortgage Fraudster California Keith W. Gledhill Californicated Nevada haters Reno Judges Steve Elliott and Fidel Salcedo.   Nevadans Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook, go back and prove you are smarter and more patriotic of your home state of Nevada.  Don’t let James “Jim” K. Olson and his Nevada hating lawyers John P. Springgate and Bridget Californicate you anymore.

Insurance Fraudsters Among Us, James K. Olson, http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/insurance-fraudsters-among-us

 Report abuse

What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 10?

A lucky lawyer.

What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 15?

Your honor.

 Report abuse

Bullies, which lawyers are good at, just don't like to be bullied do they?

"You seem to be in some distress," said the judge to the witness. "Is anything the matter?"

"Well, your Honor," said the witness, "I swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, but every time I try, the other side’s lawyer rudely interrupts and objects."

 Report abuse

This just adds to my unmistakable disenchantment with the legal system.  These California attorneys Steven T. Schoonover and Michael B. Samuels are a Leo F. Drummond, the epitome of a slimy disreputable scumbag attorney from the John Grisham The Rainmaker, screenplay and direction by Francis Ford Coppola.  I took great pleasure in seeing an arrogant and unfeeling corporation in this movie being put out of business by an expose of its ruthless and illegal practices. What's the difference between a lawyer and a hooker? A hooker'll stop screwing you when you're dead.  These California attorneys Steven T. Schoonover and Michael B. Samuels are nothing but another lawyer joke - just more sharks in the dirty water.

 Report abuse

Attorney-at-law?

More like ahole-at-large.

 Report abuse

Groovy comments.  Thanks guys.

 Report abuse

Time wounds all heels. Heel Olson, heel Schoonover, the heel judges here

 Report abuse

Craig wrote, It is a gross denial of civil rights."  Yes, it is. 

Love makes one their lover’s keeper with complete faith in one’s lover’s awesomeness to one.

So there was Morgan Olson in college, getting ready to be successful, have a different life.  Then she got yanked back to another divorce from Jim Olson to again spend thousands of dollars on legal fees, see this illegal restraining order. see their private lives again publicly trotted out, again be demonized, and again heart-broken.  It scared the shit out of her.  It scared the shit out of Morgan Olson each time Jim Olson filed to divorce her.  Each time she would emerge from another Jim Olson reconciliation with an increased terrible sense of urgency.  We all know the clock is ticking.  Morgan Olson really knows it.  Jim Olson had to have been puzzling and even disappointing at those times to Morgan Olson

Aside from not reporting his rental income so he got out of paying his lawful required share of income taxes that the rest if us pay, James K. Olson also for years, if he even ever reported, has also not reported his income from other sources.  Such as

1.                  James K. Olson was paid for playing trumpet at the Mt. Play in Marin County, CA,

2.                  James K. Olson was paid for playing trumpet at churches,

3.                  James K. Olson was paid for teaching sailing lessons,

4.                  James K. Olson was paid for teaching ballroom dance lessons in Reno, NV, Lake Tahoe, CA, and Marin County, CA,

5.                  James K. Olson was paid for being the Editor and Publisher of Biggest Little Dance Rag,

6.                  James K. Olson was paid for writing for Biggest Little Dance Rag,

I’ve become angrier, wearied and zero evenhanded when it comes to arrogant, lazy, dogmatic and incompetent Reno Judge Frances Doherty.  Reno Judge Frances Doherty is an epic calamity.

 Report abuse

Marga, this James K. Olson and his attorneys Steven T. Schoonover, John P. Springgate and Bridget Robb Peck and Reno Judge Frances Doherty and Carol Cook are all self-evident hypocrites.

Prov. 11:9: “The hypocrite with his mouth destroys his neighbor.” Gandhi said, “You must be the change you wish to see in this world.” As a liberal, dope-smoking hippie, I lean towards Quantum Physics for creation and Buddhism for daily living although I learned in this article @ http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=4333 this appealing fact that “Judaism is one religion that does not have impersonal legislation nor blind, deaf or dumb conformance to obedience.” In Matthew 23, Jesus expressed his deep contempt for true religious hypocrites. Religion to me, when it becomes Religion, Inc., is George W. Bush’s Extreme-Right meets Ayn Rand, just impersonal legislation with blind, deaf or dumb conformance to obedience.

Paul in writes 1 Cor.10:12, “If you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall.” Like tithing (giving to the church), but neglecting justice and mercy. Like doing everything for show, while really being self-indulgent and unrighteous. Like repressing the poor and widows. Like complaining about other's behavior when yours is even worse. Like testing or baiting other people or calling them base names or threatening them to try to make yourself look superior

Nothing can bring peace but yourself is how Ralph Waldo Emerson put it. There is no necessity of organized religion in any society to establish peace and keep order.

The biggest hypocrite is one who wants us to think he is trying to avoid others who he calls hypocrites but are just like he is/he is just like them. Matt. 7:5: “Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye.”

 Report abuse

Confirming Paperwork for James K. Olson Bullying, Perjury, Bigamy & Insurance Fraud and at Mr & Mrs James K. Olson

 Report abuse

No evidence provided by BrooWaha for their legal hot water allegations is automatically suspect. I gave Craig a lot of the stuff here. He figured out how to write compelling stories and to post them citing sources and posting evidentiary documents. Why isn’t BrooWaha posting both sides? It is BrooWaha that is restricting Free Speech here. Craig B. is completely correct in everything he’s written here. I can and will personally vouch for it. There is total veracity in Craig’s exceptionally well-done exposes. I was one among many that gave Craig some of the conclusive evidentiary documents he’s written about here and posted.

God Bless Craig B. I truly believe that without all that he has done here, the real reasons for why my now kicked under the wheels country with this Great Recession may never have been exposed.

Craig B. is completely correct in everything he’s written here. The evidence for what Craig’s revealed is compelling, reasonable and verifiable. There is a preponderance of that evidence. Much of that evidence is now posted several places on the Internet as well as remains in public records. All the exposed parties have had a chance to respond publicly FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW in several easily available and accessible public forums; Internet, newspapers, courts. Realtor Keith W. Gledhill LOST in court.

Band Director and ballroom dance instructor James K. Olson and his attorney Steven T. Schoonover are CHEATING in California courts with their COUNTERFEIT SERVICES resulting in fraudulently based default CALIFORNIA judgements against a Nevada citizen. Investors Scott and Feather Dugan are also CHEATING in court resulting in the loss of my home and possessions and death of some of my pets. Nevada judge Steve Elliott, among other Nevada judges, ignores the CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST rules because his wife Mendy Elliott is up to her eyeballs in mortgage fraud with Wells Fargo, Rick Vaughan, Beverly Stewart, Sheila Walther, and Scott Bice.

The same thing is now happening to Craig that happened to the rest of us victims. The bullies are out to silence us. We are casualties of what they did and again when the bullies seek to cover it up by their lies, bribes or threats. The bullies are now out to silence Craig, a voice for us victims. There is no libel or slander here in Craig’s exposes. Craig is the one being libeled here. He’s the one here being publicly called a liar with no proof offered and being threatened, censored, even wrongly punished. And BrooWaha is censoring others by removing everyone else’s comments in those articles.

Yes BrooWaha, that’s censorship.

No evidence provided by BrooWaha for their legal hot water allegations is automatically suspect. I gave Craig a lot of the stuff here. He figured out how to write compelling stories and to post them citing sources and posting evidentiary documents. Why isn’t BrooWaha posting both sides? It is BrooWaha that is restricting Free Speech here.

If what BrooWaha says is true about Craig, first prove it. We are still a country of innocent until proven guilty aren’t we? Second, BrooWaha should post the allegations against Craig so we can see it/them and make our own determination of the truth. Courts are public records for a reason. So why isn’t BrooWaha making everything public?

Why haven’t these others alleged by BrooWaha for causing legal hot water for BrooWaha posted their comments and supporting docs at BrooWaha? Why haven’t these others engaged in a public civil discourse at BrooWaha like so many others have?

The only libel and slander perpetuated here are against Craig. The only falsehoods perpetuated here are from the censorship of what’s really happened and who did it that Craig accurately exposed so well here with input from us victims. I am happy to again say or even testify as such. Cheryl Hanneman http://activerain.com/blogsview/11892/can-anyone-help-these-people-in-nevada-real-estate-fraud-

 Report abuse