REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Last Update: 7:10pm

Bigamists Among Us, Olson

by Craig B (writer), April 21, 2008

Credit:

“Escape routes exist when you are a child. All kinds of escape routes are possible. Then when you grow up they vanish and then you have to grow up and live without them." - Nicholas Gage, Eleni

Bigamy is a felony.  On February 16, 1991, James K. Olson married Morgan Olson in South Lake Tahoe with a California Confidential Marriage Certificate.   Mr. Olson signed it certifying his prior husband and wife relationship with Mrs. Olson, which had gone back to February 1982.  According to that Confidential Marriage Certificate Mr. Olson was previously married once before, so this wife was his second one.  Or did Mr. Olson lie on this Confidential Marriage Certificate?  Mr. Olson has admitted in both California and Nevada courts that he reconciled with the Reno Mrs. Olson in July 1996. 

On June 14, 2000, Jim twice forged his wife’s (Morgan) name on the purchase of a car when he signed “J. Morgan Olson” with his “JKO” initials next to it.”  In 2000, Mr. Olson forged the Reno Mrs. Olson’s married name in his purchase of a car in San Rafael, California. 

Mr. Olson got a Nevada Living Trust amendment notarized in October 2000 in Marin County, California that the Reno Mrs. Olson is his wife, in compliance with the Marin County, California 1996 MSA. 

Mr. Olson had several years of Reno homeowners insurance with the Reno Mrs. Olson as his wife. 

Mr. Olson has had for several years a Nevada Living Trust with the Reno Mrs. Olson as his wife, in compliance with the Marin County, California 1996 MSA. 

Mr. Olson claims he is also married to a California Mrs. Olson since 2004. 

Mr. Olson’s 1995 attorney prepared an August 10, 1995 Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) for the Marin County, California court.  It confirms there was no final hearing, the box wasn’t filled in for a remarry date, the lack of a standard clause about reconciling, Mr. Olson was to pay Mrs. Olson $15,000, and that the case was sealed.

The court had left these issues unresolved as it knew Mr. Olson would again reconcile.  Judge Michael Dufficy, the same judge in Mr. Olson’s last three divorce filings, recognized that Mr. Olson’s credibility was gone as Mr. Olson kept making the same complaints and allegations then (as now) but was sleeping with Mrs. Olson the whole time and kept reconciling with her.  So in the fourth divorce when Mrs. Olson said she was moving to Reno to get away from the drama, where she wanted to buy a house, the judge gave her permission to do so.  That in matters relating to her husband Jim Olson, for the convenience of the court and her so she wouldn’t have to keep coming back to the court for the court’s signature (loan applications, offers, counters, counters-to-counters, inspections, tax returns, etc.) she could operate as a single person as Mr. Olson adamantly refused to sign anything. 

Mrs. Olson bought 13870 Mt. Babcock, Reno, NV 89506 in July 1995.  That was before the MSA, and before the August 10, 1995, Marin court hearing.  The Quit Claim clause in the MSA had that Mr. Olson was supposed to Quit Claim his community property interest of that property to Mrs. Olson.  Mr. Olson refused and that clause was crossed out at his insistence.  Cora Lancelle, Mrs. Olson’s attorney, dryly asked “but why not, is he again reconciling?”  Mr. Olson’s attorney said, “Oh no Mr. Olson really wants a divorce this time.”  Ms. Lancelle sarcastically said “But Helen, that’s what he said the previous three times while continuing to sleep with her the whole time.”  Mrs. Olson said “no big deal as Jim will soon reconcile with me anyway making it a point not worth arguing over” and agreed to the cross out of the Quit Claim clause. 

“As Mrs. Olson was walking out of that August 10, 1995 court hearing, Ms. Lancelle gave up trying not to laugh.  Mr. Olson’s attorney was glowering at her and Mrs. Olson.  Mr. Olson was looking at the floor kicking it with his foot.   Judge Dufficy was trying not to laugh.  Judge Dufficy called out “good luck in your new home in Reno and especially with Jim.”” 

Since Mr. Olson refused to sign a Quit Claim and crossed out that section in the MSA, he retained a community property interest in that house.  His attorney then even commented on it in court. 

Mr. Olson showed up in Reno in September 1995 and resumed his physical, emotional and financial relationship with Mrs. Olson, who never wanted a divorce. 

Mr. Olson never paid Mrs. Olson for the community asset division in the MSA.  Mr. Olson has admitted in several court papers that he reconciled with Mrs. Olson in Reno, Nevada in July 1996.  Mr. Olson told the Reno Mrs. Olson he had dismissed his fourth Marin divorce filing.  He continued to act married to her through a series of behaviors and conduct for the next 10 ½ years. 

He wore his wedding ring.  He introduced and held himself out as her husband and she as his wife. 

Shortly after his reconciliation, Mr. Olson obtained homeowners insurance on their Reno home at 13870 Mt. Babcock, Reno, in the name of James and Morgan Olson, husband and wife.  He certified that property as his primary residence. 

Mr. Olson then funded a Nevada Living Trust together with Mrs. Olson with them as equal co-trustees.  It held title to all their Reno houses and bank accounts.  That trust is still in existence today. 

In summer 2000, Mr. Olson forged the Reno Mrs. Olson’s married name in his purchase of a car in San Rafael, California. 

Mr. Olson had a reconciliation acknowledgment notarized in October 2000 in Marin by a Marin notary acknowledging his July 1996 reconciliation and reaffirmation of his February 16, 2001 wedding vows with Mrs. Olson. 

In April 2002, the Olsons bought 5242 Echo Ave in Reno as a rental and Mr. Olson obtained a landlord’s policy on it with him as the primary and his wife as the secondary insured.  They still own that property today.  According to Farmers Insurance April 29, 2002 print date:                         

     Primary Insured          James K Olson, PO Box 8401, Reno NV 89507

     Policy Type                Lnlrd Prot

     Property Address       5242 Echo Ave Reno NV 89506 

In early October 2006, Mrs. Olson mailed Mr. Olson, at his request, $20,000 out of a home equity account. 

In late October 2006, Mrs. Olson gets a phone call from a woman that “Jim Olson had just died in California.”  Mr. Olson, in violation of the July 12, 1996 Marin County, California court judgment, surfaces and immediately claims a remarry to another.  He had still failed to pay the Reno Mrs. Olson for the community assets ordered in that judgement. 

According to the Reno Police report, after the Reno Mrs. Olson changed its locks, Mr. Olson then broke into and ransacked their then Reno home at 12260 Camel Rock Dr.  It was in a desperate effort to retrieve and destroy the original documents of his reconciliation, their Nevada Living Trust, and his love letters.  Attorney Jill Whitbeck has those originals. 

Mr. Olson then filed in Marin Court CV070655 that it determine his marital status with the Reno Mrs. Olson.  That part of the case was dismissed because the proper venue is in Family Law Court, and in Family Law Court in Nevada as Nevada has jurisdiction over them with their Nevada governed Living Trust, Reno, Nevada homeowners insurance on their Reno properties, and Reno witnesses etc.  Mr. Olson’s story had become rather hysterical in its presentation of its acerbic and churlish allegations. 

In early 2007, attorney Schoonover claims to have written Mrs. Olson April 2, 2002 at their 13870 Mt. Babcock, Reno address (although she never saw it until their first Reno hearing five years later) “You have Mr. Olson’s home address.  If there is anything you need to communicate to him, contact him there, not at work.”  This writing is the FIRST evidence that Mr. Olson was attempting to keep his husband and wife life with the Reno Mrs. Olson a secret from his work in Marin County, California. 

Four witnesses then testified in Reno court as to Mr. Olson continuing to see Mrs. Olson in Reno representing himself as her husband through September 2006. 

Divorce is not a handy vehicle for the summary disposal of old and used wives.  Which is what Mr. Olson smugly alleges he did July 12, 1996, divorce the Reno Mrs. Olson, while talking outside the other side of his mouth, his admission that he reconciled his marriage with her in Reno in July 1996. 

Reno attorney Jill Whitbeck pointed out in Mrs. Olson’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Mrs. Olson’s divorce on Page 7 Line 28 “. . . clearly there exists a dispute as to assets and debts obtained during the course of their reconciliation.”  The Olson’s MSA/July 12, 1996 “divorce” is in question due to its omissions, contradictions and discrepancies.  The Olsons husband and wife reconciliation went to October 2006 as clearly proved (preponderance of the evidence) with four current four independent witnesses, their Reno homeowners and landlord’s insurance, and their Nevada governed Living Trust.  The Reno judge found “Mr. Olson not credible.” 

In the Marin Court CV 070655 filing Mr. Olson claims “Olson is spending his time with Alexandra while he is married to his second wife.”   Yes, Mr. Olson was doing exactly that as the Reno Mrs. Olson is his second wife assuming he did not lie on their marriage certificate and he’s had other marriages. 

The Reno Mrs. Olson remains mysteriously MIA since July 2007. 

Sources are California and Nevada court public documents, MSA, Nevada Living Trust, love letters, four witnesses testimony in Reno court, San Rafael car purchase documents, photographs, Farmers Insurance documents, Washoe County public records, February 16, 1991 Marriage Certificate.



About the Writer

Craig B is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

15 comments on Bigamists Among Us, Olson

Log In To Vote   Score: 8
By Craig B on May 17, 2008 at 04:56 pm

It recently was brought to my attention that there is now a fifth witness that Jim Olson is continuing to see the Reno Mrs. Olson in Reno representing himself as her husband.  It is Roger from Eagle Electric who was at their New North West Reno home July 2007.  Roger saw Jim Olson there with the Reno Mrs. Olson when Roger was out on an estimate.  That means Jim Olson is still continuing his 17 year pattern with the Reno Mrs. Olson of hiding his life with her from his Marin County life. 

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 8
By Edward on May 21, 2008 at 03:19 pm
What I don't understand is the default order against the Reno Mrs. Olson. Service must be made within 10 days of the hearing. The reason is that this sort of travesty does not happen. Yet, service on the Reno Mrs. Olson was on a Thursday evening in Reno while she was teaching at TMCC for a first thing the following Monday morning hearing that of course she was not able to scamble on a Friday to get a California attorney for. Jim Olson and his attorney Schoonover must have falsified the date on the service for it to have been accepted by the court.
 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 8
By Craig B on May 23, 2008 at 05:22 pm

Edward, you bring up an important point that I had previously missed.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 8
By Edward on May 29, 2008 at 09:27 pm

Yeah.  I'm amazed at the level of detail that you have been right about.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 8
By Edward on June 01, 2008 at 04:07 pm

Also I did some more checking.  I found out that a person who voluntarily sees someone they have a restraining order against automatically invalidates their ro.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 8
By Craig B on June 08, 2008 at 05:24 pm
That and some other things, inspired me to write more about the mRERcurial Jim Olson, who is widely rumRERd to be the inspiration for Flip/FlopRER John McCain.
 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 8
By Edward on June 13, 2008 at 04:44 pm

I know that it's senseless to get mad or upset when people are being such jerks.  I know that their minds are just not developed enough for that person to be any different than the bad behavior they are doing.  These ill-advised actions are not done out of evil, but out of emotional immaturity.  I try, I really try to keep that in my mind when I deal with unreasonable, that I'm an adult.  Maybe I'm just as emotionally immature?

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 7
By Craig B on April 20, 2009 at 06:36 pm

When it’s the Governor of Nevada’s divorce, the Honorable Judge Frances Doherty pays attention. Yet if it’s one James “Jim” K. Olson and his Reno wife, the dishonorable lazy, incompetent, ignorant or corrupted Reno Judge Frances Doherty incredibly dismisses the Reno Mrs. Olson’s Reno divorce at the strident request of this James “Jim” K. Olson. That sure makes it look like James “Jim” K. Olson doesn’t want a divorce from his Reno wife!

Then the Marin County California courts dismissed this James “Jim” K. Olson’s Request for A Marital Determination with his Reno wife. The result is that there has been still no determination made by any court about this James “Jim” K. Olson’s marriage to the Reno Mrs. Olson while he’s claiming some 26 years later to be married to another woman in Marin County, California now living in a trailer @ http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=7+view+ridge+dr+novato+california&um=1&ie=UTF-8&split=0&gl=us&ei=E_TsSa-6GZHCswO8v8TvAQ&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1.  What is it with these trailer queens?!

Ok, although I cite all my sources, and 99% of them are from the public records, since the legal threats, none of which have materialized, I found another groovy site, as sadly Broo doesn’t have this ability in its comments to upload jpeg photos of documents I have scanned. This other site is where I have been uploading the supporting documents I have found or been provided for each of my exposes.

To view the supporting documents on Marriage Fraudster or Insurance Fraudster or Tax Fraudster or the Forgery of James “Jim” K. Olson view them @ http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/flip-floppers-among-us-marin

and http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/insurance-fraudsters-among-us and http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/anatomy-of-a-bigamist-james-k.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on May 29, 2009 at 02:20 pm

Bigamists Have High Interest In These New Viagra Drugs


New Drugs to be Developed To Meet Demand

Below is a list of new drugs users of Viagra have requested the makers of Viagra develop. Interestingly, bigamists have high interest in these new Viagra drugs.

VIAGRA-SKI
Wonderful for those who have a hard time getting up on water-skis. Forty-five minutes after taking it, you'll get up and stay up, out of the water.

DIRECTRA
A dose of this drug given to men before leaving on car trips caused 72 percent of them to stop and ask directions when they got lost, compared to a control group of 0.2 percent.

PROJECTRA
Men given this experimental new drug were far more likely to actually finish a household repair project before starting anew one.

CHILDAGRA
Men taking this drug reported a sudden, overwhelming urge to perform more child-care tasks especially cleaning up spills and "little accidents".

COMPLIMENTRA
In clinical trials, 82 percent of middle-aged men administered this drug noticed that their wives had a new hairstyle. Currently being tested to see if its effects extend to noticing new clothing.

BUYAGRA
Married and otherwise attached men reported a sudden urge to buy their sweeties expensive jewelry and gifts after talking this drug for only two days. Still to be seen: whether the drug can be continued for a period longer than your favorite store's return limit.

NEGA-VIAGRA
Has the exact opposite effect of Viagra. Currently undergoing clinical trials on sitting U.S. presidents.

NEGA-SPORTAGRA
This drug had the strange effect of making men want to turn off televised sports and actually converse with other family members.

FLYAGRA
This drug has been showing great promise in treating men with O.F.D. (Open Fly Disorder). Especially useful for men on Viagra.

PRYAGRA
About to fail its clinical trial, this drug gave men in the test group an irresistible urge to dig into the personal affairs of other people. Note: Apparent over-dose turned three test subjects into special prosecutors.

www.jokejam.com
http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/ode-to-pompus-fred
http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3630
http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/californias-legal-secret
http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/anatomy-of-a-bigamist-james-k
http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/secrets-among-us-marin-county

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Craig B on June 02, 2009 at 05:22 pm

Nevada real properties that James “Jim” K. Olson owns or has owned according to the Washoe County, Nevada Recorder’s Office. Yet, James “Jim” K. Olson lied in Reno Nevada testimony and his Reno Nevada and Marin County California court docs that he “has never owned Reno property.

1. 13870 Mt. Babcock, Reno, NV 89506
2. 5254 Echo Avenue, Reno, NV 89506
3. 5242 Echo Avenue, Reno, NV 89506
4. 14101 Stead Blvd., Reno, NV 89506
5. 9515 Autumn Leaf Way, Reno, NV 89506
6. 9450 Autumn Leaf Way, Reno, NV 89506
7. 12260 Camel Rock Dr, Reno, NV 89506
8. 3281 Platte River Court, Reno, NV 89503

Nevada properties that James “Jim” K. Olson has had homeowners and/or landlord’s insurance on according to Farmers Insurance documents and Annette G. Teixeira agent, 775-884-1021. Insurance policies that James “Jim” K. Olson obtained as the primary insured or as a landlord AND certified that The Reno Mrs. Olson was his wife.

1. 13870 Mt. Babcock, Reno, NV 89506
2. 5254 Echo Avenue, Reno, NV 89506
3. 5242 Echo Avenue, Reno, NV 89506
4. 14101 Stead Blvd., Reno, NV 89506

I got all this info off the Internet, Farmers Insurance, and or public records, specifically Washoe County, Nevada Recorder’s Office, Marin County, California courts FL 070653 and CV070655 public records, and Reno, Nevada courts FV07-00748 and DV07-00352 public records.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 6
By Marga on June 05, 2009 at 02:04 pm

I'd heard about this Olson case.  It's more than bigamy charges these guys are correctly facing.

In California, Craig Stevens, 49, formerly of Rancho Santa Margarita, CA is charged with one felony count each of bigamy, rape by belief perpetrator is spouse, grand theft by false pretense, grand theft, and sentencing enhancements for aggravated white collar crime and financial loss over $200,000. He faces a maximum sentence of 11 years and four months in state prison.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 4
By Craig B on June 11, 2009 at 07:34 pm

Marga, thank you for pointing out that bigamists face more than the bigamy charge.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Craig B on November 30, 2009 at 08:40 pm

My book Mr. & Mrs. Olson, a compilation from BrooWaha, is doing just peachy fine. Check out https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/5606

 Report abuse


Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Craig B on February 04, 2010 at 05:09 pm

Let's try that one again - Confirming Paperwork for James K. Olson Bullying, Perjury, Bigamy & Insurance Fraud and at Mr & Mrs James K. Olson

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us






x


x