What happens when the people decide to come together? Eventually they (we the people) may decide to forget about our differences, forget about our past and decide to dedicate ourselves to the successful survival of our future. Who does the government think that he is, does it believe that it is even alive without the people who formed it, run it and who pays their homage to it in taxes? It (the government) can neither breathe without the constant worship and considerations of the people who believe in it (the government). Government is not animated in any sense of the word, by no means is it capable of consent or voluntary notions and it can not contract like you and I can without a person from the â€œwe the peopleâ€ to sign for her or to appear in court as itâ€™s representative for it is a figment of our imagination, a tale from our dreams and a dream which has become a nightmare to behold. What are we frighten of, is our own creation that causes us to hide silently in the dark hoping to be safe from the tyranny of the communist manifesto, from that badly written referendum that is ill acquired by the government and that surely must come upon us should we fail to act. Why do we cower from our responsibilities as Americans, as citizens and as free men and women? Have we not seen the truth yet, or have we failed to open our eyes out of fear of such truth?
The few old men and women behind the curtain of Oz can not bind the people who put them in office, they can not control the power of unity, love, and truth, because one of these strengths, just one, would overcome her/him (the government) for these are the greatest powers on earth. How can you stop the rain from fallen from the sky, or the ocean from casting out its waves? It is impossible to control the wind or stop the sun from shining, from expressing the light of truth. If you are afraid of death, yet we all surely must die, are we afraid of life until we die we surely must live, what are we afraid of? If we love our children then we must love their future, we must dedicate our lives to the protection of that future and if that means fighting a tyrannical government that if not stopped surely must rule them and their future, then we would have failed them and left their future in the hands of a fictitious corporation that has no love and no human heart. What are we afraid of? Not even their armies can exist without the hands of men and women like you and I, those who wear their helmets so proudly, tote their duffel bags and present their arms to bear. When will â€œwe the peopleâ€ decide to end all wars, it is in our power to command, the hands that God has given us to control the mind that wheels the strength that power our bodies in this life. It is men and women that make weapons, that use the weapons on other men and women. It is men and women like you and I who doctor the wounded soldiers and watch them die. We play all the roles that lead to death and tyranny and destruction, how is this so. Most of us are afraid of the government for deep down we all see the beast in her, we see the demon in him and we recognize the evil intent of its unchecked nature. How can we be afraid of it, how can we shrink form our duties, isnâ€™t it true that we are not afraid to die on the battle fields of the governmentâ€™s nonsensical wars? Isnâ€™t it true that we are willing to allow the government to think for us, to decide for us and to command us? Isnâ€™t it true that we hide behind the government like a child hiding behind its parents for protection when we should be standing in front of her(the government) like free men and women? What do we normally say? We say "why donâ€™t the government do this or do that"?, But we have never recognize that it was the government that creates our problems that we should always demand from them a cure. And by doing so, we have given them our strength as sovereign people to control our destiny. So it was the government that made the calls to start a war, you the citizen just went along for the ride, it was the government that made the call for the income tax fraud, and you again just went along for the ride. Wasnâ€™t it government that agreed to sell our future and the future of our children? Was it government that is determined to control the world while claiming democracy? Is your eyes open yet? Did you find your balls yet? Do we even remember where they are? And isnâ€™t it true that it is government that continues to ignore the people who created it, who service it and who protect it?
Do we believe that somehow the government will not come for us (one by one they will take us), that it is just those people over their, they will not arrest me because I havenâ€™t done anything illegal or wrong? The frightening thing is that we believe that the government can do no wrong, and has never told a lie, that they are working to secure the nation. But if you should look closer you may find that they are working to destroy the workings of the nation, and that is why we find everything going wrong with our system. Our education is failing, our criminal justice system is failing, our political system is failing, the checks and balances which hold the very government together is failing, and as we all know our foreign diplomacy has failed. Let me suggest that this is no coincident, that we have failed by design and not by lack of intelligence or abilities as a nation, we have failed because the system was designed to fail, it was orchestrated by people who wish to corrupt the nature of the Constitution and the Bill of rights in order to control the Guns and many other things(guns which protects us from foreign and domestic enemies) that are in the hands of the people. They have altered the fact that now we must check in with them in order to have and own a gun, that we must register and be accepted or denied by them the right to own a gun. Furthermore that we are to pay taxes on guns, taxes that was only meant for manufactures to pay at the time of producing these guns and shippers to pay at the moment of shipment (so the people at Waco died because they were perceived as people who were setting up their own government within their own church).
U.S. Constitution: Second Amendment
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The government has sort every possible reason to curtail and repeal this law even going so far as to say that this Amendment only included military people within the states. However the federal government cannot legislate for the sovereign state governments so they have no legal jurisdictions to interpret the constitution for the state governments nor for its people. If you take careful notice of this Amendment it states very clearly that the security of the state (not the federal government) is in question here and the right of the people (not the state or federal military) to bear arms, shall not be infringed. At the time the constitution was made the people (Paul Revere and the regular citizens) were the soldiers (private citizens like you and I)each state use them as their on call militia and so when the founding fathers made this law it was intended for the average citizen to have the power of gun ownership, and the purpose was obvious (in case of invasion and in case the government themselves become tyrannical and oppressive) to be able and prepared to defend enemies foreign and domestic.
In United States v. Miller, the Court sustained a statute requiring registration under the National Firearms Act of sawed-off shotguns. After reciting the original provisions of the Constitution dealing with the militia, the Court observed that ''with obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made. It must be interpreted with that end in view.'' The significance of the militia, the Court continued, was that it was composed of ''civilians primarily, soldiers on occasion.'' It was upon this force that the States could rely for defense and securing of the laws, on a force that ''comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense,'' who, ''when called for service . . . were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.''
(HERE IS WHERE THEY TAKE YOU OFF TRACK CONCERNING THE LAW)
Therefore, ''in the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a 'shotgun having a barrel of less than 18 inches in length' at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well- regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.''
Since this decision, Congress has placed greater limitations on the receipt, possession, and transportation of firearms, and proposals for national registration or prohibition of firearms altogether have been made. At what point regulation or prohibition of what classes of firearms would conflict with the Amendment, if at all, the Miller case does little more than cast a faint degree of illumination toward an answer.
In making this court decision the judge knew that the people had the right to have and own a gun, yet in order to confuse that right (the appearance of law) he in the above court case went from taking about the history of the gun laws which empowered the people to have guns to talking about a shotgun which was considered illegal and on the basis of this one gun use that negative analogy to condemn all gun ownership by the people, and all subsequent regulations and illegal gun laws stem from this case. An illegal gun (a sawed off shotgun was consider illegal and inefficient, but what does the efficiency of this gun have to do with the right to bear arms.) or which in some cases was improperly manufactured or a privately altered gun doesnâ€™t have anything to do with the peopleâ€™s right to have and own a gun, this was an evil strategy that was once again pulled over the gullible citizens.
The government canâ€™t afford the unity of the masses; they can not tolerate the shocking evidence of truth now developing all around us so they must stop any wave of love that may grow within the people by division, conflict and instigation. Should we the people decide to change the reality of our lives we have the power to do this over night, and the government knows this, if we are determined to alter the income tax then overnight we shall disregard them as a nation and as a unified people. If we decided to end war then we shall no longer create any weapons in manufacturing plants or soldier in any war until government submits to and pays homage to its masters (â€œwe the peopleâ€). There is no turning back for the wave of tyranny is upon us, and the armored tanks shall sit in front of our doors should we not stand together now to bind up government with the rope of the Constitution and the will of the people.
LEISURE - CELEBRITIES
Copyright © 2010 Credo
Will Of The People
The Power And Will Of The People, It Makes All The Difference In The World.
Copyright © 2010 Credo
Read more articles on: education
About the WriterWant to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!
1 comments on Will Of The People
Rate This Article
Your vote matters to us