REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Saturday, December 16, 2017

Let's Really Be Individuals

by neil6 (writer), Sydney, Australia, February 01, 2013

Credit: Beth Graham
Brian of Nazareth addresses the crowd-

Summarises the good and ill of 'collective action' by government. Compares proposed actions of the Obama administration and the actions of the Labor Party in Australia.

Have a good look look at the famous scene from the timeless comedy classic 'Life Of Brian'. Brian of Nazareth addresses the adoring crowd and says he doesn't want people following him. No, he wants people to work things out for themselves. Makes you laugh? Well, it should also make you cringe a bit as well. Are we really 'working out things for ourselves?' Or are we soaking up the mantra of 'collective action' instead? Do you believe your government always knows best and looks after your interests like a sort of benign older relative? I don't and never have.

So let's translate this in terms of President Obama's second inauguration speech shall we? The theme of the speech came early. We cannot uphold individual freedom as a principle he said. We must temper it with "collective action". What does this mean? According to Obama, it demands that "we must do.....things together, as one nation and as one people." Now what concretely does that mean? We can't literally do things "as one people". Obviously it means that the government is going to do things that free individuals (acting alone or in voluntary associations) would not choose to do on their own.

Obama, of course, didn't say that. He left it purposefully vague, saying it was like group action. "No one person can.......build the roads and networks and research labs, that will bring new jobs and businesses to our shores." It is inspiring rhetoric, there's no doubt about it.

But the actual meaning became clear later on, when the President hinted at his priorities over the next four years; to protect the entitlement state and to crusade against global warming. Translation : collective action will require us to surrender lots of our money and our freedom to the government.

What if someone does not want to act "as one nation"? What happens if he or she wants to think about the issue and pursue their own course of action, on their own terms? I've already written on the 'Latest News On Climate Change' and it isn't what dedicated lovers of Global Warming want to hear.

What has the collectivist action of a Labor government in Australia meant over the last five years? Once again delivered with heart-warming rhetoric. It has meant a rankly unpopular Carbon Tax and a Mining Tax, because it was incorrectly believed our export of iron ore to China would provide the government with an endless cash cow. Well guess what? Demand slowed in China, the price of iron ore fell and no tax was collected. It has meant a total debacle with the roll out of a government subsidised insulation scheme for homes. It has meant a national broadband network grand implementation, that has cost and will cost, billions of dollars with precious little uptake by consumers. It has meant overpaid government executives spending a fortune criss-crossing the country with nothing to show for it. It has meant a poorly administered education subsidy plan that did not work. Yes, our taxpayer dollars were wasted in ineffective and sometimes bizarre collectivist initiatives. We have gone from a well-managed budget surplus to be several hundred million dollars in debt. Did I want this? I'm sure if I had been asked, I would be told with a straight face, that these initiatives were in the country's, and by implication mine as well, best interests. In our 'best interests'? Yeah right.

In George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984, he uses two appropriate terms, 'doublethink' and 'Newspeak'. Doublethink was the act of holding opposite ideas in your mind, but believing them both at the same time. Newspeak was the language used to communicate the ideas generated by doublethink. Collectivist governments want you to believe they always act in everyone's best interests. Brian was onto something as far as I am concerned. Just how funny was that scene? Funny enough to make you crnge a little? Or am I just an obstinate and probing individual?



About the Writer

Since 2009 I have devoted myself to not only writing 2 books on 'Life Cycles', but also maintaining 2 blogs and writing numerous other articles. This is to display the sheer breadth of evidence I have amassed. I have more books and more research planned, after all it isn't every day, you are privileged enough to have discovered the "missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle of life".
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

2 comments on Let's Really Be Individuals

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By John Nelson on February 04, 2013 at 04:44 pm

You enjoy clean water... Did you get that by yourself? Did you get it from one good corporate citizen who decided to stop polluting the ground water? No! You enjoy clean water (and air, and safe flights paths, and safe work conditions) because of collective efforts and government backing...The same is true with the 8-hr work day, overtime pay rules, social security, end of child labor and a host of other things we enjoy. We did not get them through individual effort or corporate good graces. We struggled for them as a people!

You may not like Obama and I'm sure the radio programs you listen to help feed your disdain..... but you don't want to return to the Gilded Age either. If we returned to the age of Social Darwinism and Eugenics you will not be better off...

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By neil6 on February 04, 2013 at 10:01 pm

You obviously believe in big government and lots of spending (some of it questionable) . I'm afraid true wealth is the result of individual entrepreneurial endeavour. The government takes from its citizens taxes and levies and then all socialist governments spend up big with this money. It, of course, gets worse when it is all borrowed money. $22 trillion in unfunded debt as I currently understand.

I guess we don't agree, but then again it's our democratic right not to agree. By the way my main focus is five years worth of wastage by the Australian Labor party. I don't listen to radio programs and I don't believe in eugenics, but I do believe in small government, small bureaucracy, less tax and less regulations and more incentives for business.

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us



x


x