Friday, September 21, 2018

If at first you don’t Succeed, Secede!

Credit: T8S
Not Again!

Actually there is a lot more to the present enthusiasm for secession than secession.

I was amused to discover on Blog Catalogue earlier this week that secession petitions are flooding into the White House in the wake of Barack Obama’s re-election to the presidency. What, are we really back in 1860, is American on the threshold of a new Civil War? No and yes, is my answer, a point to be clarified a bit later.

There they are, pleas coming from some of the same offenders: from Texas, from Alabama, from Georgia, from Louisiana, from South Carolina, from North Carolina, from Tennessee, from Arkansas and from Florida, all former members of the old Confederacy. There are also petitions from Missouri and from Kentucky, states that at least had a presence on the Stars and Bars.

But – my goodness – there are also petitioners from the blue North, from Indiana, from Oregon, from Michigan, from Montana, from New Jersey and – would you believe it? – from New York! So the Civil War solved nothing. Secession is alive and well in American political consciousness! Actually, it’s one of the great ironies of American history that the original thirteen states, in casting off one imperial union, bound themselves to another, far less mutable in every sense.

Anyway, Obama has only himself to blame. Oh, I don’t mean in being re-elected, though that is the clear cause of an autumn of discontent among some Americans. I mean he is at fault in agreeing to the White House’s We the People website, set up last year with the aim of allowing “all Americans a way to engage their government on issues that matter to them.”

The promise is that if a petition from any given state reaches 25,000 signatures within thirty days the White House has to respond. That from Texas has crossed this threshold, now standing at well over 100,000 signatures. North Carolina is also over, with South Carolina not far behind. I await Obama’s reaction with interest.

Most of the petitions make reference to the words of Declaration of Independence;

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

…Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and institute new Government…

That from Texas is more specific, taking us to the real heart of the matter;

Given that the state of Texas maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas to withdraw from the union, and to do so would protect its citizens' standard of living and re-secure their rights and liberties in accordance with the original ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no longer being reflected by the federal government.

I think this is superbly put. On the news sites I’ve looked at a lot of the responders are saying that the whole thing is racist, that there are lots of people, especially in the South, who simply do not like a Black Man in the White House. I’m not saying that’s not true; it probably is in some cases, but I can see no evidence on the point. It looks more to me like an unthinking reflex: that criticism of Obama, any criticism, is almost racist by definition. It’s a way of sidetracking the real and substantive issues over his imperial presidency.

With Obama back there are genuine concerns, as the Texans make clear, over the future direction of the country; it’s as well that people have an opportunity to make their views known, even if it’s only to challenge the darker angels of Obama’s nature. He is hoist, so to say, with his own petard!

Anyway, the real issue is about consensus, the real issue is about democracy itself. In any normal electoral process the minority, small or large, bows out with reasonable grace, agreeing to abide by the outcome, recognising the government as their government, even if they did not vote for it. In essence this is governing by consensus, a civil society bound together by a common understanding, a common set of values.

The alternative, a highly dangerous state of affairs, is governing without consensus, where the minority feels alienated from the whole political process. This was the state of affairs in Northern Ireland for decades. Now I'm not suggesting that the United States is any way similar to Northern Ireland, but fissures are appearing in the body politic which may very well have serious future consequences, where people increasingly begin to feel that the federal government no longer represents their interests, no longer reflects the principles upon which the nation stands.

No, we are not back in 1860 but over the next four years a new kind of civil war may very well be fought. Obama clearly presides over a house divided, more divided than it has been in decades. If anything his victory has compounded his problems. His constituency is younger, poorer, browner, more blue collar, less self-reliant. John O' Sullivan rightly notes in the Spectator, that this will inevitably lead to pressures for more regulation, more welfare, greater government spending, higher taxes and more unionisation; it will lead to expectations that Obama, faced with a precipitous fiscal cliff cannot meet, at least not without ruining an older and wealthier America, no matter its race or ethnicity. Meanwhile America's creditors, particularly China, are looking on.

This is not 1860 but the house is most certainly divided against itself. Will it stand? I honestly can't say. But one thing I am certain of - Obama is no Lincoln.

About the Writer

Anastasia is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

3 comments on If at first you don’t Succeed, Secede!

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By neil6 on November 18, 2012 at 08:19 pm

Yes, another great article. I was not aware of the secession petitions. All Americans have, I believe, some 16 trillion reasons to be concerned about their economic future. This is, in round figures, the size of their national debt and it's being added to every month by QE forever, at the behest of Dr. Bernacke of the Fed.

All this to reduce unemployment figures before the election. Let's just say the timing was strategic. Simply raising the debt ceiling in January isn't going to make this go away. I read lately that the Government is blaming baby boomers for not spending enough, what with zero interest rates etc. Frankly they'd be mad if they did spend up.

I'm also wondering why an article about the US doesn't have local commentary. Anyway this Aussie says to this Brit "Well done."

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Anastasia on November 18, 2012 at 09:11 pm

Thanks, Neil. It's sweet of you to say so. :-) You will find this same article on Ana the Imp under the title A House Divided. It attracted a range of comments.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By John Nelson on November 28, 2012 at 04:45 pm

The talk of secesion is just sour grapes!

The American people have spoken. Obama won a landslide (332-206 electoral votes.) That's how our democracy works.

62,611,250 Americans voted for President Obama as compared to Romney's 59, 134, 475. It's simple math!

It doesn't matter if the Sour Grape crowd gets 59, 134, 475 signitures...They lost! The people have spoken.

So if Alabama wants to leave...fine. They're a drain anyway (they're our Greece.)... Most of those states on the secesion petition list get more dollars in federal aid then they send to Washington in federal taxes. The fed subsidizes them. In America we all have one vote.... The end result was a sweeping victory for Mr. Obama.

Most of these petition signing mopes had their day with GW Bush and his two unfunded wars, USA Patriot Act, extraordinary rendition, torture, and they left us with an economy in ruin. The country has spoken....We don't want the economic model the Republican were pedaling... We saw the result of that economic policy in 1929, 1987, and in 2008.

If some Americans (individuals) wish to leave the Union, then you have free-will....MOVE! I'm not sure you'd find another nation to your liking.... Not since Berlin fell in 45' anyway.

 Report abuse

Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.

Rate This Article

Your vote matters to us