Thursday, September 20, 2018

England’s Lost King

by Anastasia (writer), London, September 04, 2012

Credit: Wikimedia commons
Richard III - an English Macbeth

The body of Richard III, lost for many centuries, may have been found buried under a car park. Is this the end of his long winter of discontent?

How are the mighty fallen in the midst of battle…and buried under council car parks. This, according to recent speculation, was the fate of Richard III, England’s last Plantagenet king, killed at the Battle of Bosworth in August, 1485. Now archaeologists working in Leicester in the centre of the country say that they may be close to finding his remains, under the said municipal car park.

Actually what they are really saying is that they may have found part of a Franciscan foundation known as Greyfriars – dissolved and destroyed during the Reformation - , where the monarch may have been buried after his naked body had been gawped at for several days after death.

While I have no desire to criticise the team headed by Professor Richard Buckley of Leicester University (nonsense, I do!) it all seems a tad premature. Yes, OK, it attracts attention, though not in the best archaeological tradition. Well, maybe we are playing at Raiders of the Lost King.

At the risk of being accused of academic snobbishness there seems to me to be a strong element of wishful thinking and pop archaeology here, not really that surprising in that the dig is to be featured in a forthcoming documentary on Channel 4, one of our terrestrial TV broadcasters.

On reflection that might not be that bad – after all Time Team, a Channel 4 show, is pop archaeology at its best – but for the fact the Richard III Society is also involved in this sack him up project.

Now, the Richard III Society, for those unfamiliar with the organisation, has an agenda, not one, I have to say, that is politically or academically disinterested. No, for them Richard is a much misunderstood man, a black villain only in Tudor propaganda, the wicked hunchback of Shakespeare’s fertile imagination. Their man, rather, is more sinned against than sinning.

I’ve never quite understood why Richard, who ruled for only two fairly disastrous years, has excited such fascination. He was a bad king, a bad politician and an appalling strategist. But for his miscalculations the Lancastrian cause, comprehensively defeated in the so-called Wars of the Roses (it was the Scot Scott who gave it that title) may itself have been buried forever.

His fall began with a crime - the murder in the Tower of his young nephews Edward V and Richard, duke of York. Oh, there is no doubt about that, despite the objections of the Richard III Society, as anyone who has the least knowledge of medieval records will confirm.

The existing documents contain an exhaustive account of royal grants and expenditure, mention often being made of the most politically insignificant people. The Princes are there, at least until the summer of 1483, when they vanish altogether from the record, receiving no further mention. To save himself, and to completely undercut Henry Tudor in 1485, Richard only had to produce them in public. He could not. He was Macbeth and they were the ghosts at his feast.

So, let’s get back to the dig. I read in the press that the archaeologists and their Richardian allies hope that finding the remains, if they find the remains, will help change the way the king is viewed historically. Really? Do bones speak? How on earth could a few broken fragments change the past?

The Richard III Society view is that it would end the “enormous disparagement” of his reputation. Quite frankly that’s just nonsense. All the dry bones could prove - if there are enough of them - is that he wasn’t a hunchback with a withered arm, but that’s a perception that has long been discarded. Hunchbacks with withered arms don’t generally ride into battle.

I welcome archaeology as genuine archaeology and I really do hope that Richard is found, if only to answer a long-standing mystery. But so far as his reputation is concerned, any remains, no matter how complete, will stay stubbornly silent.

About the Writer

Anastasia is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

4 comments on England’s Lost King

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By neil6 on September 05, 2012 at 04:54 pm

An excellent piece of analysis. I can't believe there still is a 'Richard III Society'. Truly eccentric, even by the best of British stanards. Well done.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By JerseyLil on September 06, 2012 at 12:22 am

Ana, that would be quite a discovery but you are right, a tad premature. I have English roots on my father’s side and I’m very interested in English history but have a hard time understanding such fascination with Richard III. The Richard III Society is overly optimist about those bones! Good article!

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Anastasia on September 06, 2012 at 05:46 pm

Thanks, Neil. There is indeed. :-)

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Anastasia on September 06, 2012 at 05:49 pm

Thanks also, Lil. :-) I've heard nothing further - I don't really expect to - but if I do I'll let you know.

Have you been here? The Bosworth battlefield site and heritage centre is very good if you ever want to visit.

 Report abuse

Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.

Rate This Article

Your vote matters to us