REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Friday, November 24, 2017

GAY SEX & MARRIAGE – A SOCIALLY AND MENTALLY RETARDED ISSUE

Judicious persons and physicians must find ways to cure this mentally abnormal and unnatural thinking of Gay Marriages and Sex, as it is both mentally and socially retarded idea.

The idea and thought of Gay Marriage is not only unnatural, abnormal but anti-divine. The divine nature created two genders among all living beings that are among humans, animals, birds, flora and fauna. If Adam and Eve were not there in the beginning, we are not there. Had divine nature created either only two Adams or only two Eves, we would not have been here existing. If two quite opposite genders were not created i.e. female and male this many animals, birds ocean beings and human population would not have existied, similarly this much of flora and fauna would not have been spread and we would not get fruits and vegerables to eat if Gay activity occurs in flora and funa. So, for the very existing of the entire creation two opposite genders are pre-requisite and the co-habitation between them is essential. This is a quite normal and natural living process. Any thing against this concept is unnatural, abnormal, anamolous and devient.

If our cerebration is normal we get the ideas that are normal and consistent with natural and social principles. If thinking process turns retarded or anomalous then behaviour becomes abnormal and unnatural. So any one who possess abnormal behaviour or lives against the principles of nature are considered to be mentally retarded as it is their disability to think normally and naturally. So to speak straight, the marriages or trials for cohabitation between the same genders is abnormal and such very thought shows the symptom of retardation of mind to think normally and rather severely. If you keenly observe even among the animals or birds Gay sex does not exist. But, why these so called civilised humans are behaving and thinking in an abnormal way and against the principles of nature is a big controversial question. In pre-civilisation eras or even in the post-industrialisation era upto beginning of this century this kind of symptoms was not there among the humans. Gay sex or marriage ideas are only two or three decades old illness of mind for some people with abnormal and retarded thinking.

Now the issue has become politicised in Democratic nations. ‘Abnormality’ is being promoted by Demagogues with an attempt not to lose even those minute percentate of votes of those abnormal persons, instead of finding ways to cure their mentally abnormal thinking. Some specialised curing institutions must be established to treat the people with demands for Gay sex or marriages. In this direction the policy makers, judicious persons and physicians must think to protect the civilization, instead of promoting abormal behaviour and thinking of such people. Otherwise and policy decisions taken by Democratic government to accept and promote Gay Sex and Marriages becomes a socially and mentally retarded policy. By dchaitanya



About the Writer

dchaitanya is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

7 comments on GAY SEX & MARRIAGE – A SOCIALLY AND MENTALLY RETARDED ISSUE

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Notumbus Bumbus on May 12, 2012 at 09:38 am

Methinks thou doth protest too much. The real demogogues wear a religious face. Asking for a right is not the same as making everyone adhere to someone else's limitations of rights.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: -1
By dchaitanya on May 12, 2012 at 10:05 am

But how far it is acceptable to the natural and social principles to demand for a right that is against them. And next demagogues are there among religious and non-religious people. Thank u Bambus Esq., your critical comments on my writings always thrills me.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Notumbus Bumbus on May 14, 2012 at 10:48 am

Glad to provide a thrill! BTW, a right is only against someone who is denied that right by others. If you have the right to equality under the law, and some others do not, then the law is wrong, not the right to possess the right. Laws that give rights to one set of people but deny them to another set are inherantly wrong, and must be changed. If you don't agree with gay marriage, don't have a gay marriage - that is clearly an equal right for anyone. But denying it to those who do want it is simply wrong.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: -1
By dchaitanya on May 14, 2012 at 11:38 am

Law has not given equal rights to the police and common man alike to shoot at others. If police shoot at a criminal it is lawful, if I shoot at a criminal (other than in self-defense) it is unlawful. So Rights can be given to right things, Rights can not be conferred upon things that are wrong and they are never conferred equally to avoid indiscriminate misuse. Even democracies conferred limited Rights on citizens everywhere. if every perversion is leagalised in the guise of Rights of every body must be respected, then the entire society gets perverted. As a matter of Right if every crime is legalised also as a matter of equality before law, as a crime is Right or right for somebody then law itself gets criminalised. Every wrong that destroys the society or nature can be legalised, if it is solely considered that it is a matter of possession of equal rights and just as a matter of equality before man made law or just as a right to possess a right. Laws that give rights to large sections of people to live peacefully but deny criminals' Right to destroy the peaceful living of people - does it not again denial of those criminals' Right to disturb the peaceful living of public. Criminals also claim that they have right to do crime. Should we give them their right to do crime?

So, for the smooth functioning of the society and to avert the destruction of social order sooner, unnatural and wrong things can not be admitted, which perhaps even animaldom may also not known. Thanks for good fighting.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Notumbus Bumbus on May 14, 2012 at 01:06 pm

Uh, animaldom? New word for me. Anyway, homosexual behavior occurs in nearly every mammal species. So how does this make your assumptions about "natural law" the only possible definition?

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By dchaitanya on May 14, 2012 at 08:17 pm

Animaldom is new word for Bambus as BTM for me. Homosexuality is for production of off shoots or for perverted enjoyment? God given birth to women to be enjoyed by men and vice versa. I still do not understand how it is natural and joyful for some men to sleep with men and some women to sleep with women. It is really a perverted and unnatural for 99% of population in the world. If hetrosexuality is not unnatural this should have occurred since the times of genisis of mankind and this much of population would not have been here and, today Bambus or chaitanya would not have been here to discuss here. So, it is only a quite modern perversion.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By dchaitanya on May 14, 2012 at 08:23 pm

If homosexuality is not an unnatural thing this should have occurred since the times of genisis of mankind and this much of population would not have been here and, today Bambus or chaitanya would not have been here to discuss this. So, it is only a quite modern perversion. As you said because homosexuality also exists in animaldom or even among the mammals, do we follow them. If animals are examples for us, then what we are for and why this civilisation and social order?

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us



x


x