REAL STORIES
BY REAL PEOPLE Search
Friday, November 24, 2017

Defender of the Faith

Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Saint Augustine looks on in dismay

Christianity has to be defended against the intolerant secular prophets of the modern age

I grew up in the Church of England and while I no longer attend, apart from family days and holidays, and even then only to please my parents, I still retain a considerable affection for the institution, for the part that it has played in the history of this nation. If I did not feel affection, a lingering sense of respect, I could look upon the pronouncements of Rowan Williams, the muddle-headed Archbishop of Canterbury, with equanimity; but I cannot; he retains the power to madden me with some of his more outrageous statements.

So, yes, I value the Church of England just as I value Christianity, as I value spirituality in general. Even so I can respect atheism, those who have no place in their personal life for God our any form of spiritual insight; those whose horizons are purely (I was tempted to write bleakly) material. What I loath is the atheist proselytisers, those who would discard one set of absolutes only to promote another, bringing to the debate the worst forms of intellectual intolerance. God is dead; Richard Dawkins is alive. The new faith is totalitarian secularism, worse in ever way than the old faith of ritual and transcendence.

In one previous Papal Bull Dawkins said that the real abuse by Roman Catholic priests may not be the ‘groping of child bodies’ but the ‘subversion of child minds.’ Saint Richard would have it otherwise; he would chase Christianity to the margins of superstition and darkness in the creation of the kind of an earthly paradise, outlined by John Lennon in Imagine, a song with a message I cannot listen to without a compete sense of disgust. There is no earthly paradise. More particularly, as we should know from the history of the past hundred years, the attempt to create one always ends in hell.

The attacks on the Catholic Church, the attacks on Christianity in general, show that the faith needs a defender. It could ask for no better one than Peter Hitchens, one of my favourite polemicists, the author of The Rage Against God, an exploration of his own journey from Marxism and atheism to belief.

In this he brings to bear his lucidity and acidy wit against the aggressive secularism taking hold of a society that no longer has clear idea of itself. One only has to look at the progress of the last government’s equality legislation, which effectively tried to dictate what people thought of homosexuality. One only has to look at the present government’s proposals on gay marriage, which dismisses all principled dissent as ‘homophobia.’ We are dealing here with new forms of state corruption, with the subversion of freedom of conscience and freedom of speech; with the subversion of moral choice itself.

Hitchens compares what is happening in our morally debased society with what happened to organised religion in Soviet Russia when faced with the aggressive atheism promoted by the state. The parallel is not too extreme, at least I do not believe so. There has been a long process of secularisation at work, but it has taken more pervasive forms in our recent history, with the likes of Dawkins and his disciples occupying the high ground, sitting on judgement on all below.

Who would ever have believed that Christianity would have been on defensive in the land of Augustine? It’s time to fight back; time for a spiritual renaissance. The alternative is grim beyond measure; the alternative is barrenness; the alternative is Dawkins.



About the Writer

Anastasia is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

6 comments on Defender of the Faith

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Kevin Goodman on May 09, 2012 at 12:54 pm

Interesting post Anna. I have argued in the past that religion is beyond the reach of science and that claims otherwise equate with dogmatism http://kevin-goodman.com/?p=1572 and I also hold that agnosticism is appropriate in accordance with the problem of induction in the philosophy of science http://kevin-goodman.com/?p=1597 . Nevertheless, I’m an evolutionist and often assumed an atheist though I do not see it that way. However, I must say that I feel a good deal of moral dissonance when faced with literalist fundamentalists because I believe they are wrong.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Anastasia on May 10, 2012 at 06:05 am

Yes, I feel sure you will know Wittgenstein's observation - Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen (whereof we cannot speak thereof we must be silent). I really have no time for fundamenatalists. The secular variety are the worst of all. What would life be like, I ask myself, without doubt and mystery?

I hugely enjoyed your article on fundamentalism. I shall look forward to reading the other also. Now I'm in a rush!

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Notumbus Bumbus on May 10, 2012 at 10:20 am

Whenever I hear calls to "defend" some belief system, I cannot help but think that any such belief system apparently lacks rigor and substantive value if people feel it needs defending beyond it's own supposed "logic". If it cannot stand on its own, then it has not stood the test of time and the benefits of rational thinking. It seems to me that anything that must argue for it to be defended against people who choose NOT to believe it fails it's own internal valuation. If it be christians, jews, muslims, who apparently cannot abide someone else in the world holding different beliefs, or consider it perverse that others hold to no belief at all, and are somehow threatened in their own beliefs because of these divergent opinions, well, the problem does not lie without the belief system, but within.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Anastasia on May 10, 2012 at 05:18 pm

The heading is an allusion to Fidei defensor , a title granted by Pope Leo X to Henry VIII, after the king had published Defence of the Seven Sacraments, a rebuttal of the doctrines of Martin Luther. Once again, Bum Bus, you have shown yourself to be an ass, the Nick Bottom of this site. In future I shall think of you as Bottom Bus. :-)

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Randy Mitchell on May 23, 2012 at 03:25 pm

Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life." For myself, as a Christian, there's no need to defend my beliefs because I know they are true. Unfortunately, we live in a secualr world who's constantly at war with religion, no matter which. The only thing which will change someone's mind is for them to experience death, then actually see, "the light." My opinion. Love the article, Anastasia.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Anastasia on May 24, 2012 at 05:28 pm

I'm glad, Randy. :-)

 Report abuse



Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.


Rate This Article


Your vote matters to us



x


x