Saturday, September 22, 2018

Doc Rationing

Credit: Dr Blofeld
Yes, British health care is a bit of a joke.

Health care is a hot topic in American politics. But, please, please, do not be seduced by the British ‘ideal’ of socialised medicine.

The latest issue of the Spectator has an article by Florence King in which she says that you Americans secretly yearn for a British-style National Health Service (NHS) but will never admit it (To your health, 21 April). Writing from Fredericksburg, Virginia, she says that Doc Martin, the whimsical medical comedy set in Cornwall, is a big hit with you Yanks. It’s not just the whimsy of the whole thing but the sheer delighted of watching people enter and leave a doctor’s surgery without having to pay a thing. Ah, my friends, this is such stuff as dreams are made on.

I wonder how many people in the States really know about our health care provision. Yes, it’s true; family doctor services and hospital care are indeed ‘free at the point of contact’. The real costs are elsewhere, and they are considerable. Anyway, let me take you by the hand and lead you through the streets of socialised medicine. I’ll show you something that’s bound to change your mind.

King’s article recalled a piece I wrote some years ago exposing some of the more outrageous aspects of the NHS. I shall proceed with the same points, though updated and adjusted principally for an American audience.

To begin with you might like to know where I am coming from. For people who read my articles and blogs my politics should be fairly obvious by now: I am Conservative and conservative, right-wing and libertarian. I have, to be honest, almost no experience at all of the NHS as a consumer. My parents have private health insurance, in which I am included, which means we have never had to queue, never experienced rationing, never had to negotiate our way around the gatekeepers who hold the keys to state-provided medicine in this country. Does that not disqualify me from passing comment? I don’t believe so. For, you see, I know how good health care can be. I don’t see why people in general, people who supposedly can’t afford private provision, but still pay huge amounts in tax for public care, should not have access to a far, far better service.

When David Hannan, a Conservative Member of the European Parliament, had the courage to question that the NHS was the best of all possible worlds he was immediately cudgelled from right and left. He was criticised for running down Britain’s ‘most loved’ institution by one senior figure in the Labour Party. Others joined in with shallow and egregious points; that Hannan was attacking ‘our hard-working doctors and nurses’ when he had done nothing of the sort. It’s a bit like saying that criticism of the war in Afghanistan is an attack on our service personnel. Hannan’s criticism was levelled at the structure and organisation of the NHS, which, in its fundamentals has remained unreformed for sixty years, yes, sixty years.

Oh, how we delude ourselves when we say that the NHS is the ‘envy of the world’ when it’s the envy of virtually no one, certainly not in the developed world; certainly not, as Hannan has pointed out repeatedly, in places like Singapore. Think about it and ask yourself one core question: what exactly is the NHS? Well, let me tell you exactly how I conceive of it: it’s a holdout, the last survivor of war-time Britain and of the austerity Britain of the post-war years; Old Labour and Hard Labour Britain. It’s about rationing and more rationing; it’s about queues and queuing; it’s not the best you can get - it’s all you can get.

And what can you get? Well, we know from past reports on some of our filthy hospitals that you can get disease, you can get this super bug or that super virus, brought to the world by our state health system. If one is not all that sick when one goes in to hospital one has a good chance of getting sick before coming out, assuming one comes out at all. I read George Orwell’s essay How the Poor Die not so long ago, and while things are not as bad in the NHS as that extreme it seems to me that there are points where it comes close.

Now for some specifics. Those unfortunate enough to suffer a heart-attack or a stroke, or to develop cancer, have a far lower survival rate in Britain than anywhere else in Western Europe. Provision of care is not universal or uniform because the more expensive treatments become the more invidious and unfair the rationing, medicines allowed in some places and not in others. If you have to get sick try not to get sick in this country; that‘s the reality of our ‘much loved' institution.

I suppose when most people think of the NHS they think of health care professionals, nurses and doctors and so on. I don‘t: I think of bureaucrats and managers; I think of the massive amounts of cash that pour into the organisational black hole they have created, from which no light escapes. This is not a people-based system. Its priorities are elsewhere.

And what solution do I offer? That’s easy: I would dismantle this bloated monster and return power to the people, to the consumers. We can easily have a world class health care system based upon insurance. Those who can pay should pay. Why, most people pay already, and heavily, through taxation, receiving a poor return for their money. And we can still have a fair system, one that provides for all, even the poorest. We don’t have to go down the American road, there are plenty of other ‘opt-out’ systems in the world, systems that have avoided the trap of building health care on the basis of general taxation, the lest efficient method possible. In Singapore people enjoy a higher level of health care while paying less for it, while the state pays for those who can’t. Health is better, tax is less. What is wrong with that?

Sadly we can’t have debate about these issues in this country because any attempt to challenge the efficiency of the NHS is immediately shouted down in an irrational and emotive fashion. Yes, I know; people are frightened of change; even Conservative politicians are frightened of change because they are worried about the electoral consequences of throwing eggs at the juggernaut. I have no hesitation in saying that the NHS needs fundamental reform, that the alternatives should be quietly and rationally explained; that this Bastille of welfarism should be destroyed and the bricks used to build anew.

Watch Doc Martin and dream. Just do not take these dreams for reality. That belongs to Doc Rationing.

About the Writer

Anastasia is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

4 comments on Doc Rationing

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Randy Mitchell on April 28, 2012 at 01:36 pm

Obamacare is nothing but an attempt at governmental control. It's filled with deficit-busting programs which will do nothing put place us closer to socialism, and spin our national debt through the stratosphere. The only item I agree with is for people to get insurance with pre-existing conditions, other than that...

Thanks for sharing this here, Anastasia.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Anastasia on April 29, 2012 at 05:39 pm

Randy, thanks. The national debt is a burden for generations to come. It's killing America.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Uttam Gill on May 01, 2012 at 09:56 am

Your article has stimulated my mind once again to speak my mind. Anastasia, even if you have leaning towards particular line of political thoughts, I am sure you will certainly not miss out the critical necessity of wellness of all the subjects of any country...Whether it is through insurance or by any means in given conditions health aspect of the individual needs to be addressed with utmost urgency…NHS as propagated by the politicians or anybody as matter of fact has got far reaching consequences…Whether you are in queue or not, as long as everyone gets a good and affordable health care attention on time, that would work and that’s where any political leadership would not flirt with any ideas which do not have an approval of the masses.

If we go by this notion “payable when I am able” it won’t bring any solace to people who are economically weak…They cannot afford to buy insurance cover and that’s where state has to butt in…Health of population is as important as national security of the country…It has it’s bearing…

Remember preserving a man amidst all chaos is as good as miracle…Those who are born needs to be preserved and NHS of any nation can do so…if anybody wish to take mileage out of this…It’s okay…as long as it delivers good…it is good…

I keenly read your articles…You write so well… Keep it up

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 0
By Anastasia on May 01, 2012 at 05:29 pm

Uttam, yes, we just need a proper balance of public and private provision. A health care system funded through general taxation is inevitably going to provide an uncertain, often second rate service. I thank you for being a loyal reader. :-)

You should consider joining Blog Catalogue. Tony linked this article there. It generated an interesting debate, with me on the one side and just about everyone else on the other, just the way I like it! The woman is strongest who stands most alone. :-)

 Report abuse

Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.

Rate This Article

Your vote matters to us