Saturday, December 15, 2018

Patagonia Belongs to the Indians

by Anastasia (writer), London, February 12, 2012

Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Argentina's Madame Botox

Argentina’s claim to the Falkland Islands is based on the deepest hypocrisy.

This year marks the thirtieth anniversary of Argentina’s illegal invasion of the Falkland Islands, a fiasco which turned out to be a political gift by a gang of fascist thugs to Margaret Thatcher, the British Prime Minister at the time. Argentina has never lost it’s hankering after a group of islands it calls Las Malvinas, though its connection is tenuous at best and the local people, all English speaking, want to preserve their link with Britain.

Now, in this anniversary year, the Argentinean government has upped the ante by lodging a protest in the United Nations over Britain’s ‘militarisation’ of the Falklands. Apparently the military bases on the islands have been modernised to such an extent that they could be used to attack the whole of South America, including Brazil and Chile, notwithstanding the fact that the latter was a valuable ally of Britain during the conflict!

It’s a fantasy, of course, dismissed as ‘complete rubbish’ by Mark Grant, Britain’s ambassador to the UN. But fantasy plays a big part in the politics of Buenos Aries. Fantasy allowed the government to describe Prince William, who is in the Falkland’s at the present as part of a Royal Air Force search and rescue team, as a ‘conquistador.’

Cristina Kirchner, Argentina’s president, Madame Botox herself, has said that the presence of British warships in the islands “poses a grave danger to international security.” Hector Timerman, the country’s foreign minister, not to be outdone by the president, says that the population of the islands is not indigenous.

Yes, an interesting point of view, given that many of the inhabitants have roots in the islands going back well over a hundred years, given that there is no native indigenous Argentinean population. Perhaps we should extend the principle to Argentina itself, perhaps that country should restore the territory to the south of Buenos Aeries it so rapaciously seized from the indigenous inhabitants in the nineteenth century during the so-called Conquest of the Desert which wasn’t a desert at all. Yes, that’s right. Patagonia belongs to the Indians!

Britain has a duty to the people of the Falkland Islands, a duty of defence, a duty to secure the islands from the vagaries of Latin American politics and neurotic governments, fascist at one turn, democratic at the next. As long as they wish us to remain we will remain, no mater how much Botox Christina or Fidel Castro, that pathetic old dinosaur, disapproves.

About the Writer

Anastasia is a writer for BrooWaha. For more information, visit the writer's website.
Want to write articles too? Sign up & become a writer!

2 comments on Patagonia Belongs to the Indians

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Spaniardish on April 20, 2012 at 08:59 am

Patagonia belongs to Indians, maybe. But then so do USA. If not, Islas Malvinas would belong to Spain. Please you, learn a little of History. Had the English the dutie to defend the island when they settled there without asking Spain? Please do not be so egocentric.

 Report abuse

Log In To Vote   Score: 1
By Anastasia on April 21, 2012 at 01:53 am

Is that you Kristina? -))

Forgive me, but I think English is not your first language? I word you are looking for is ethnocentric, not egocentric, unless you really think I am selfish, which has nothing at all to do with this particular subject. So far as a ‘little history’ is concerned I wrote about the background two years ago in on my blog. Be my guest.

But you are missing the essential point; the people of the Falklands do not want to be ruled by Buenos Aires and Madame Botox. So long as that remains the case we will stay, whether you like it or not.

 Report abuse

Add A Comment!

Click here to signup or login.

Rate This Article

Your vote matters to us